Literature DB >> 10748811

The timing of disability measurements following injury.

J A Baldry Currens1, T J Coats.   

Abstract

Disability following trauma has profound personal, social and economic costs. Currently, measurement of disability is not standardised and no agreed time interval between injury and disability measurement exists. This study was designed to define the best time at which to measure disability following trauma. The functional independence measurement (FIM) and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) were assessed at 3, 6, 12 and more than 24 months after injury for 201 trauma patients. The best time to measure was defined as the point at which a steady state was reached, i.e. when further functional improvement ceased. Motor FIM showed significant change between 3 and 6 month assessments (p < 0.002) and 6 and 12 months (p < 0.002). No statistically significant change occurred beyond 12 months (p > 0.02). For Cognitive FIM, there was significant change between 3 and 6 months (p = 0.02), but not beyond 6 months (p > 0.2). For GOS there was significant change between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.002) and 6 and 12 months (p < 0.002) but not beyond 12 months (p > 0.2). Disability measurements should be performed 12 months after injury, when patients have reached a steady state. This time of measurement should be adopted as the standard for trauma databases and outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10748811     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(99)00244-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  7 in total

1.  Individual and population burdens of major trauma in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Herman R Holtslag; Eduard F van Beeck; Rob A Lichtveld; Loek Ph Leenen; Eline Lindeman; Chris van der Werken
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  A systematic review of studies measuring health-related quality of life of general injury populations.

Authors:  Suzanne Polinder; Juanita A Haagsma; Eefje Belt; Ronan A Lyons; Vicki Erasmus; Johan Lund; Ed F van Beeck
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Modelling long term disability following injury: comparison of three approaches for handling multiple injuries.

Authors:  Belinda J Gabbe; James E Harrison; Ronan A Lyons; Damien Jolley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Measuring the population burden of injuries--implications for global and national estimates: a multi-centre prospective UK longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ronan A Lyons; Denise Kendrick; Elizabeth M Towner; Nicola Christie; Steven Macey; Carol Coupland; Belinda J Gabbe
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Factors influencing psychological, social and health outcomes after major burn injuries in adults: cohort study protocol.

Authors:  Martha Druery; Peter A Newcombe; Cate M Cameron; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Cost-effectiveness of an integrated 'fast track' rehabilitation service for multi-trauma patients involving dedicated early rehabilitation intervention programs: design of a prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Sevginur Kosar; Henk Am Seelen; Bena Hemmen; Silvia Maa Evers; Peter Rg Brink
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2009-01-30

7.  Effects of Virtual Reality on Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs for Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sara García-Bravo; Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda; Joaquín Domínguez-Paniagua; Raquel Campuzano-Ruiz; Estrella Barreñada-Copete; María Jesús López-Navas; Aurora Araujo-Narváez; Cristina García-Bravo; Mariano Florez-Garcia; Javier Botas-Rodríguez; Alicia Cuesta-Gómez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.