Literature DB >> 10747216

Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces boulardii and Escherichia coli combinations against experimental infections with Shigella flexneri and Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium in gnotobiotic mice.

J V Filho-Lima1, E C Vieira, J R Nicoli.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus acidophilus, Saccharomyces boulardii and Escherichia coli are probiotic strains used individually to protect against enteropathogenic agents. In order to determine if a synergistic effect of the individual protective mechanisms ordinarily attributed to each of these biotherapeutic agents is possible, we orally administered Lact. acidophilus H2B20, S. boulardii and E. coli EMO (LSE) to germfree mice. Ten days after colonization of the digestive tract, groups of animals associated (experimental) or not (control) with LSE were challenged orally with streptomycin resistant (Sfr) or streptomycin sensitive (Sfs) Shigella flexneri strains or Salmonella enteritidis subsp. typhimurium. Bacterial counts in faeces from experimental mice showed that the Sfr strain was eliminated 11 d after challenge while Sfs and S. enteritidis subsp. typhimurium colonized the digestive tract and continued to be present at high population levels (108 CFU g-1 of faeces), which is similar to that observed in control animals. All possible di- and monoassociations of the three probiotics with gnotobiotic mice were also performed before experimental oral infection with Sfr. The data showed that antagonism was obtained only when E. coli EMO was present. Different sensitivity of Sh. flexneri Sfr and Sfs to E. coli EMO antagonism could be explained by the different generation times between Sfr and Sfs, as shown by colonization kinetic experiments in the digestive tract of gnotobiotic mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10747216     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00973.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  21 in total

1.  Effect of lactobacillus on the gut microflora and barrier function of the rats with abdominal infection.

Authors:  Huan-Long Qin; Tong-Yi Shen; Zhi-Guang Gao; Xiao-Bing Fan; Xiao-Min Hang; Yan-Qun Jiang; Hui-Zhen Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection.

Authors:  S Hudault; J Guignot; A L Servin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Pretreatment of mice with streptomycin provides a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis model that allows analysis of both pathogen and host.

Authors:  Manja Barthel; Siegfried Hapfelmeier; Leticia Quintanilla-Martínez; Marcus Kremer; Manfred Rohde; Michael Hogardt; Klaus Pfeffer; Holger Rüssmann; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Effects of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on the rate of natural chlamydia infection in swine.

Authors:  M Pollmann; M Nordhoff; A Pospischil; K Tedin; L H Wieler
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Genotypic and physiological characterization of Saccharomyces boulardii, the probiotic strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Laura Edwards-Ingram; Paul Gitsham; Nicola Burton; Geoff Warhurst; Ian Clarke; David Hoyle; Stephen G Oliver; Lubomira Stateva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Preliminary investigation of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG in horses: fecal recovery following oral administration and safety.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Maureen E C Anderson; Andrew Lowe; Gabrielle J Monteith
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Exogenous phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria changed the rhizosphere microbial community indirectly.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Wenyu Qi; Qiang Li; Shu-Guang Wang; Chao Song; Xian-Zheng Yuan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Preliminary evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a potential probiotic in dogs.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Maureen E C Anderson
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.008

9.  Live probiotics protect intestinal epithelial cells from the effects of infection with enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC).

Authors:  S Resta-Lenert; K E Barrett
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Like will to like: abundances of closely related species can predict susceptibility to intestinal colonization by pathogenic and commensal bacteria.

Authors:  Bärbel Stecher; Samuel Chaffron; Rina Käppeli; Siegfried Hapfelmeier; Susanne Freedrich; Thomas C Weber; Jorum Kirundi; Mrutyunjay Suar; Kathy D McCoy; Christian von Mering; Andrew J Macpherson; Wolf-Dietrich Hardt
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.