Literature DB >> 10746753

Implementation of Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR): experience from the national Healthy Start program.

M Baltay1, M C McCormick, P H Wise.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The implementation of the Fetal and Infant Mortality Review (FIMR) process was examined as part of the evaluation of the national Healthy Start program, a federal program designed to reduce infant mortality in several communities. The implementation of the FIMR process over the 5-year funding period is described in terms of productivity, barriers and facilitators to implementation, and project expenditures.
METHODS: Data were derived from grant continuation applications and personal interviews with program staff to produce a qualitative description.
RESULTS: As of the summer of 1996, 14 of the 15 Healthy Start sites in the national evaluation had successfully implemented the FIMR process. Most sites had developed a two-tiered review process for examination of case data in which a review by health and social services professionals was followed by community review. In the period 1993 to 1995, the percentage of fetal and infant deaths reviewed had a median of 34% with a range of 4-79% across the sites at a cost of $600 to $3400 per death reviewed. Recommendations were variably implemented.
CONCLUSIONS: The FIMR process provides an important opportunity to contribute to the knowledge base regarding infant mortality in these communities. The process, however, has important logistical requirements and may require substantial financial resources that may affect implementation of confidential inquiries into infant mortality and other health problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10746753     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022393805416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the Healthy Start program. Design development to evaluative assessment.

Authors:  K S Raykovich; M C McCormick; E M Howell; B L Devaney
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Prenatal pediatrics: traditional specialty definitions no longer apply.

Authors:  V G Nichols; D W Bianchi
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Back to the future: community involvement in the Healthy Start Program.

Authors:  E M Howell; B Devaney; M McCormick; K T Raykovich
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.265

4.  Measuring the quality of medical care. A clinical method.

Authors:  D D Rutstein; W Berenberg; T C Chalmers; C G Child; A P Fishman; E B Perrin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  History of the maternal mortality study committees in the United States.

Authors:  J G Marmol; A L Scriggins; R F Vollman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Lessons from the confidential enquiry into perioperative deaths in three NHS regions.

Authors:  J N Lunn; H B Devlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-12-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A community-wide infant mortality review: findings and implications.

Authors:  L McCloskey; A L Plough; K L Power; C A Higgins; A N Cruz; E R Brown
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1995.

Authors:  B Guyer; D M Strobino; S J Ventura; M MacDorman; J A Martin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Categories of preventable unexpected infant deaths.

Authors:  E M Taylor; J L Emery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  A strategy to reduce infant mortality.

Authors:  E C Davidson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fetal and Infant Mortality Review: an evolving process.

Authors:  K Buckley; J L Chapin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.