Literature DB >> 10744214

Interdental distraction osteogenesis and rapid orthodontic tooth movement: a novel approach to approximate a wide alveolar cleft or bony defect.

E J Liou1, P K Chen, C S Huang, Y R Chen.   

Abstract

The closure of a wide alveolar cleft and fistula in cleft patients and the reconstruction of a maxillary dentoalveolar defect in traumatic patients are challenging for both orthodontists and surgeons. This is due to the difficulty in achieving complete closure by using local attached gingiva and the great volume of bone required for the graft. In this article, the authors propose using interdental distraction osteogenesis to create a segment of new alveolar bone and attached gingiva for the complete approximation of a wide alveolar cleft/fistula and the reconstruction of a maxillary dentoalveolar defect. They performed this procedure on one patient with a traumatic maxillary dentoalveolar defect and 10 patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lips and palates who had varied dentoalveolar clefts/fistulas. Interdental and maxillary osteotomies were performed on one side of the dental arch by the cleft or defect. After a latency period of 3 days, the osteotomized distal segment of the dental arch was then distracted and transported toward the cleft or defect by using a toothborne intraoral distraction device. The alveoli and gingivae on both ends of the cleft or defect were approximated after distraction osteogenesis. The need for extensive alveolar bone grafting was eliminated. A segment of new edentulous alveolus and attached gingiva was created interdentally at a site distant to the cleft or defect. In the cleft patients, teeth were moved orthodontically into the regenerate (newly formed alveolar bone) dental crowding 1 week after distraction. The orthodontic tooth movement was rapidly completed in 3 months, and the edentulous space was eliminated. Interdental distraction osteogenesis minimizes an alveolar cleft/fistula and helps reconstruct a maxillary dentoalveolar defect by approximating the native alveoli and gingivae; it also creates new alveolar bone and gingiva for rapid orthodontic tooth movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10744214     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200004040-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Segmental maxillary distraction with a novel device for closure of a wide alveolar cleft.

Authors:  Vasilios A Bousdras; Chandra Liyanage; Michael Mars; Peter R Ayliffe
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

2.  A new device for alveolar bone transportation.

Authors:  Omar Vega; Daniel Pérez; Viviana Páramo; Jocelyn Falcón
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2011-06

3.  Closure of large alveolar defect by maxillary alveolar distraction using a vector-controlled distractor appliance in cleft patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Sujata Mohanty; Priyank Rai; Neha Bhutiani
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  Maxillary tuberosity reconstruction with transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  F Ugurlu; B Basel; B Cem Sener; A Sertgöz
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2012-05-31

5.  Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Majid Ghasemianpour; Sara Ehsani; Soodeh Tahmasbi; Mohammad Bayat; Maedeh Ghorbanpour; Seyed Mohammadreza Safavi; Fatemeh Sadat Mirhashemi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

6.  Orthodontically guided bone transport in the treatment of alveolar cleft: A case report.

Authors:  Estefanía Alonso-Rodríguez; Elena Gómez; Marta Otero; Rosario Berraquero; Begona Wucherpfennig; Juan Hernández-Godoy; Jorge Guiñales; Germán Vincent; Miguel Burgueño
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-02-01

7.  Orthodontic Treatment and Maxillary Anterior Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis of a Subject with Williams-Beuren Syndrome and Isolated Cleft Palate: A Long-Term Follow-Up from the Age of 5 to 24 Years.

Authors:  Tetsutaro Yamaguchi; Tatsuo Shirota; Mohamed Adel; Masahiro Takahashi; Shugo Haga; Ryo Nagahama; Misato Nakashima; Mayu Furuhata; Takaaki Kamatani; Koutaro Maki
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-07-04

8.  A bibliometric analysis of research on craniomaxillofacial distraction osteogenesis from 2000 to 2021.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Jianying Yang; Changhan Zhou; Yao Liu; En Luo
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-01

9.  Protocol and Evaluation of 3D-Planned Microsurgical and Dental Implant Reconstruction of Maxillary Cleft Critical Size Defects in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Krzysztof Dowgierd; Rafał Pokrowiecki; Maciej Borowiec; Zuzanna Sokolowska; Martyna Dowgierd; Jan Wos; Marcin Kozakiewicz; Łukasz Krakowczyk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Repair of segmental bone defects in the maxilla by transport disc distraction osteogenesis: Clinical experience with a new device.

Authors:  James Boonzaier; George Vicatos; Rushdi Hendricks
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Jun
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.