C Yildirim1, H I Altinsoy. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey. yildirimc@hotmail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the value of distance alternate-letter suppression testing in the objective assessment of fusional control of intermittent exotropia. METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive patients with intermittent exotropia (study group) and 112 normal subjects (control group) underwent a series of measurements including distance alternate-letter suppression testing, Worth 4 Dot test at distance and near, and distance and near stereo acuity tests to see whether sensorial behavior differed in the study and control groups. The distance alternate-letter suppression test and distance stereo acuity tests were performed using the Mentor B-VAT II-SG Video Acuity Tester and Binocular Vision Testing System. The TNO test was used to measure near stereo acuity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with intermittent exotropia (24%) presented suppression with the distance alternate-letter suppression test, but none of the normal subjects (p<0.001, chi2 test). Only, three patients (4%) showed suppression on the Worth 4 Dot test at distance, and all had fusion on the Worth 4 Dot test near. Patients with intermittent exotropia had significantly diminished distance stereo acuity compared to normal subjects (p<0.001). Normal subjects and patients had good near stereo acuity (p>0.05). Patients with intermittent exotropia who had fusion with the distance alternate-letter suppression test had significantly better distance stereo acuity than patients who had suppression (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Distance alternate-letter suppression testing and distance stereo acuity tests may be useful as objective measures for assessing sensory loss in patients with intermittent exotropia.
PURPOSE: To investigate the value of distance alternate-letter suppression testing in the objective assessment of fusional control of intermittent exotropia. METHODS: A total of 71 consecutive patients with intermittent exotropia (study group) and 112 normal subjects (control group) underwent a series of measurements including distance alternate-letter suppression testing, Worth 4 Dot test at distance and near, and distance and near stereo acuity tests to see whether sensorial behavior differed in the study and control groups. The distance alternate-letter suppression test and distance stereo acuity tests were performed using the Mentor B-VAT II-SG Video Acuity Tester and Binocular Vision Testing System. The TNO test was used to measure near stereo acuity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with intermittent exotropia (24%) presented suppression with the distance alternate-letter suppression test, but none of the normal subjects (p<0.001, chi2 test). Only, three patients (4%) showed suppression on the Worth 4 Dot test at distance, and all had fusion on the Worth 4 Dot test near. Patients with intermittent exotropia had significantly diminished distance stereo acuity compared to normal subjects (p<0.001). Normal subjects and patients had good near stereo acuity (p>0.05). Patients with intermittent exotropia who had fusion with the distance alternate-letter suppression test had significantly better distance stereo acuity than patients who had suppression (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Distance alternate-letter suppression testing and distance stereo acuity tests may be useful as objective measures for assessing sensory loss in patients with intermittent exotropia.
Authors: Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Brian G Mohney; Michael C Brodsky; Jonathan M Holmes Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 5.258