Literature DB >> 10743557

Genome rearrangement with gene families.

D Sankoff1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The theory and practice of genome rearrangement analysis breaks down in the biologically widespread contexts where each gene may be present in a number of copies, not necessarily contiguous. In some of these contexts it is, however, appropriate to ask which members of each gene family in two genomes G and H, lengths lG and lH, are its true exemplars, i.e. which best reflect the original position of the ancestral gene in the common ancestor genome. This entails a search for the two exemplar strings of same length n (= number of gene families, including singletons), having the smallest possible rearrangement distance: the exemplar distance.
RESULTS: A branch and bound algorithm calculates these distances efficiently when based on easily calculated traditional rearrangement distances, such as signed reversals distance or breakpoint distance, which also satisfy a property of monotonicity in the number of genes. Simulations show that in two random genomes, the expected exemplar distance/n is sensitive to the number and size of gene families, but approaches 1 as the number of singleton families increases. When the basic rearrangement distance is just the number of breakpoints, the expected cost of computing the exemplar breakpoints distance (EBD), as measured by total calls to the underlying breakpoint distance routine, is highly dependent on both n and the configuration of gene families. On the other hand, basing exemplar distance on exemplar reversals distance (ERD), the expected computing cost depends on the configuration of gene families but is not sensitive to n. AVAILABILITY: Code for EBD and ERD is available from the author or may be accessed at http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/viart/exemplar_di s. html CONTACT: sankoff@ere.umontreal.ca.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10743557     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  27 in total

1.  LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.

Authors:  Michael Brudno; Chuong B Do; Gregory M Cooper; Michael F Kim; Eugene Davydov; Eric D Green; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Natural family-free genomic distance.

Authors:  Diego P Rubert; Fábio V Martinez; Marília D V Braga
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.405

3.  The infinite sites model of genome evolution.

Authors:  Jian Ma; Aakrosh Ratan; Brian J Raney; Bernard B Suh; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DUPCAR: reconstructing contiguous ancestral regions with duplications.

Authors:  Jian Ma; Aakrosh Ratan; Brian J Raney; Bernard B Suh; Louxin Zhang; Webb Miller; David Haussler
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Reconstructing genome trees of prokaryotes using overlapping genes.

Authors:  Chih-Hsien Cheng; Chung-Han Yang; Hsien-Tai Chiu; Chin Lung Lu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A scenario of mitochondrial genome evolution in maize based on rearrangement events.

Authors:  Aude Darracq; Jean-Stéphane Varré; Pascal Touzet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Parsimony and likelihood reconstruction of human segmental duplications.

Authors:  Crystal L Kahn; Borislav H Hristov; Benjamin J Raphael
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  ComPhy: prokaryotic composite distance phylogenies inferred from whole-genome gene sets.

Authors:  Guan Ning Lin; Zhipeng Cai; Guohui Lin; Sounak Chakraborty; Dong Xu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  MSOAR 2.0: Incorporating tandem duplications into ortholog assignment based on genome rearrangement.

Authors:  Guanqun Shi; Liqing Zhang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Sorting by reversals, block interchanges, tandem duplications, and deletions.

Authors:  Martin Bader
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.