| Literature DB >> 10742936 |
I W Miller1, C E Ryan, G I Keitner, D S Bishop, N B Epstein.
Abstract
Ridenour, Daley, and Reich conducted a series of factor analyses using the correlational matrix of the subscale scores of the Family Assessment Device (FAD), published in Family Process, December, 1999. They conclude that "the FAD subscales be reorganized from their current seven-subscale format" (p. 507). We propose that this suggestion for reorganization is premature and based on the inappropriate application of an "internal consistency" model of scale construction to the FAD. We further suggest that the most important criteria regarding an assessment instrument are those of reliability, validity, and clinical utility. In the absence of this kind of data regarding alternative organizations of the FAD, we believe that the original subscales remain the best choice.Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10742936 DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39112.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fam Process ISSN: 0014-7370