Literature DB >> 10742525

Evolution of ammonia and urea tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster: resistance and cross-tolerance.

.   

Abstract

We examined whether populations of Drosophila melanogaster could evolve a genetically based tolerance to high levels of toxic compounds (urea or ammonia) added to their larval food medium. We also examined whether tolerance to one compound may impart cross-tolerance to other compounds. Five populations selected for ammonia tolerance (AX), five populations selected for urea tolerance (UX), and five unselected controls (AUC) were assayed for developmental time, viability, and female fertility. These characteristics were measured on each of the 15 populations reared on one of three larval food conditions (plain banana-molasses, 0.35 M NH(4)Cl, or 0.266 M urea). On urea-supplemented media, the urea-selected populations developed fastest and expressed the highest viability; the ammonia-selected populations developed significantly faster and had a higher viability than the controls. Similarly, on ammonia-supplemented media, the ammonia-selected populations developed fastest and expressed the highest viability; the urea-selected populations developed significantly faster and had a higher viability than the controls. This suggests that a cross-tolerance exists for resisting different toxic compounds. Urea-selected females reared on urea-containing food media displayed superior fecundity, without any observable cross-tolerance effect. When all populations were reared on food containing 0.266 M urea, the urea-selected populations had the lowest levels of urea in their tissues. All populations reared on food containing 0.37 M ammonia or 0.266 M urea, contained more ammonia in their tissues than did populations reared on plain food.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10742525     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00165-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  6 in total

1.  Faster development does not lead to correlated evolution of greater pre-adult competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Shakarad; N G Prasad; Kaustubh Gokhale; Vikram Gadagkar; M Rajamani; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us?

Authors:  N G Prasad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003 Apr-Aug       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Bioreactor culture of recombinant Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells: characterization of metabolic features related to cell growth and production of the rabies virus glycoprotein.

Authors:  Kamilla Swiech; Nickeli Rossi; Bruna Gabriela Silva; Soraia A C Jorge; Renato Mancini Astray; Cláudio Alberto Torres Suazo
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Physiological correlates of ecological divergence along an urbanization gradient: differential tolerance to ammonia among molecular forms of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Billy Tene Fossog; Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio; Pierre Kengne; Flobert Njiokou; Nora J Besansky; Carlo Costantini
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Egg Viability, Mating Frequency and Male Mating Ability Evolve in Populations of Drosophila melanogaster Selected for Resistance to Cold Shock.

Authors:  Karan Singh; Ekta Kochar; N G Prasad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Neural Circuits Underlying Fly Larval Locomotion.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kohsaka; Pierre A Guertin; Akinao Nose
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.116

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.