Literature DB >> 10742425

The use of colorflow duplex scanning to detect significant renal artery stenosis.

H T Hua1, D B Hood, C C Jensen, S E Hanks, F A Weaver.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience with colorflow duplex scanning in detecting significant renal artery stenosis and to validate the criteria used: renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV) >/=200 cm/sec and renal-to-aortic peak systolic ratio (RAR) >/=3.5. The results of renal artery duplex and arteriography in 58 patients (107 kidneys) who underwent both exams were reviewed. Arteriography revealed 32 main renal arteries with >/=60% stenosis. The PSV criterion detected 29, for a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 75%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 95%, and accuracy of 79%. Using RAR >/=3.5 provided a sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 92%, PPV of 79%, NPV of 88%, and accuracy of 86%. In a subset of 36 kidneys that had hilar scans, the criteria of acceleration time (AT) >/=100 cm/sec and index (AI) </=3.78 kHz/sec were evaluated. The AT and AI yielded sensitivity of 50% and 36%, specificity of 86% and 100%, PPV of 70% and 100%, NPV of 73% and 71%, and accuracy of 72% and 75%, respectively. Colorflow duplex scanning is clinically useful in screening for hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis. The renal artery PSV criterion is highly sensitive, with a high NPV that obviates the need for arteriography in most cases of a negative duplex. The criteria of RAR, AT, and AI are of less value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10742425     DOI: 10.1007/s100169910022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  5 in total

1.  Doppler ultrasound and renal artery stenosis: An overview.

Authors:  A Granata; F Fiorini; S Andrulli; F Logias; M Gallieni; G Romano; E Sicurezza; C E Fiore
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2009-10-12

Review 2.  Gray-Scale, Color Doppler, Spectral Doppler, and Contrast-Enhanced Renal Artery Ultrasound: Imaging Techniques and Features.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Difference between renal and splenic resistive index as a novel criterion in Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Clemens Grupp; Michael J Koziolek; Manuel Wallbach; Kerstin Hoxhold; Gerhard A Müller; Carsten Bramlage
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renovascular hypertension: clinical diagnosis and indications for revascularization.

Authors:  Edmund Kenneth Kerut; Stephen A Geraci; Chester Falterman; David Hunter; Curtis Hanawalt; Thomas D Giles
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  A comparison of Power Doppler with conventional sonographic imaging for the evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Agatino Manganaro; Giuseppe Ando'; Antonino Salvo; Andrea Consolo; Frank Coppolino; Domenico Giannino
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.