Literature DB >> 10741935

Efficacy and tolerability of 20 mg pantoprazole versus 300 mg ranitidine in patients with mild reflux-oesophagitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, and multicentre study.

J H van Zyl1, H de K Grundling, C J van Rensburg, F J Retief, S J O'Keefe, I Theron, R Fischer, T Bethke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of low dose pantoprazole (20 mg) (a gastric proton pump inhibitor) with standard dose ranitidine (300 mg) (a histamine-receptor antagonist), in their ability to relieve symptoms and heal oesophageal lesions associated with gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
METHODS: Patients with endoscopically established mild GORD (stage I, modified Savary-Miller classification) were enrolled into a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison study (intention-to-treat population, n = 201; age range, 18-82 years). Patients took either oral pantoprazole 20 mg in the morning (n = 101) or ranitidine 300 mg in the evening (n = 100) once daily for 4 weeks or, if the healing was not complete, 8 weeks. Relief from key symptoms (heartburn, acid regurgitation, pain on swallowing) was assessed after 2, 4, and if applicable, 8 weeks. Healing of lesions was confirmed endoscopically after 4 and, if applicable, 8 weeks.
RESULTS: Complete relief from key symptoms was noted after 2 weeks in 70/88 (80%) patients treated with pantoprazole vs 45/89 (51%) patients treated with ranitidine ('per-protocol and key-point available' populations, P < 0.001); the corresponding results after 4 weeks were 77/88 (88%) vs 51/88 (58%) (P < 0.001). Complete healing of lesions after 4 weeks of treatment was seen in 74/88 (84%) vs 49/89 (55%) in the pantoprazole and ranitidine group, respectively (P < 0.001, per-protocol); by week 8 the cumulative healing rates were 84/88 (95%) vs 69/89 (78%) in the pantoprazole and ranitidine group, respectively (P < 0.001). For the intention-to-treat populations, the corresponding values for healing after 4 and 8 weeks were 73% vs 49% (P < 0.001) and 83% vs 69% (P < 0.05), respectively. Both study medications were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: Compared to ranitidine 300 mg, the regimen with pantoprazole 20 mg provides faster relief from symptoms and is significantly more effective in healing of oesophageal lesions in patients with mild reflux-oesophagitis. Thus, the low dose of pantoprazole offers a treatment approach which minimizes drug exposure and costs while retaining high efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10741935     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200012020-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  8 in total

1.  Therapeutic management of uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in france in 2005: Potential cost savings of omeprazole substitution.

Authors:  Stéphane Mouly; Agnès Charlemagne; Philippe Lejeunne; Francis Fagnani
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2009-08

Review 2.  Pantoprazole: an update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acid-related disorders.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Amitabh Prakash; Diana Faulds; Harriet M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Hong Wang; Jia-Qing Huang; Ge-Fan Zheng; Harry Hua-Xiang Xia; Wai-Man Wong; Shiu-Kum Lam; Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Pilot study of on-demand therapy with pantoprazole 20mg for long-term treatment in patients with mild gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Theo Scholten; Uwe Pustlauk; Peter Sander; Martina Bohuschke; Gudrun Gatz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults.

Authors:  Taline A Boghossian; Farah Joy Rashid; Wade Thompson; Vivian Welch; Paul Moayyedi; Carlos Rojas-Fernandez; Kevin Pottie; Barbara Farrell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-16

Review 7.  Science review: The use of proton pump inhibitors for gastric acid suppression in critical illness.

Authors:  Stephen Brett
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Clinical profile of patients presenting with dysphagia - an experience from a tertiary care center in North India.

Authors:  Tuhin Mitra; Vinod K Dixit; Sunit K Shukla; Dawesh P Yadav; Piyush Thakur; Ravi K Thakur
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-11-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.