Literature DB >> 10741820

Signs and symptoms of the myofascial pain syndrome: a national survey of pain management providers.

R N Harden1, S P Bruehl, S Gass, C Niemiec, B Barbick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess clinical consensus regarding whether myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a legitimate and distinct diagnosis as well as the signs and symptoms characterizing MPS.
DESIGN: A standardized mailed survey with return postage provided.
SUBJECTS: A total of 1,663 American Pain Society members in medically related disciplines listed in the 1996/1997 directory. OUTCOME MEASURES: A standardized survey assessing clinical opinion regarding whether MPS is a legitimate diagnosis, whether MPS is a clinical entity distinct from fibromyalgia, and the signs and symptoms believed to be "essential to," "associated with," or "irrelevant to" to the diagnosis of MPS.
RESULTS: Of the 403 surveys returned, 88.5% respondents reported that MPS was a legitimate diagnosis, with 81% describing MPS as distinct from fibromyalgia. The only signs and symptoms described as essential to the diagnosis of MPS by greater than 50% of the sample were regional location, presence of trigger points, and a normal neurologic examination. Regarding the signs and symptoms considered to be essential or associated with MPS, more than 80% of respondents agreed on regional location, trigger points, normal neurologic examination, reduced pain with local anesthetic or "spray and stretch," taut bands, tender points, palpable nodules, muscle ropiness, decreased range of motion, pain exacerbated by stress, and regional pain described as "dull," "achy," or "deep." Sensory or reflex abnormalities, scar tissue, and most test results were considered to be irrelevant to the diagnosis of MPS by a large proportion of the respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: There was general agreement across specialties that MPS is a legitimate diagnosis distinct from fibromyalgia. There was a high level of agreement regarding the signs and symptoms essential or associated with a diagnosis of MPS. Differences across specialties are discussed. This survey provides a first step toward the development of consensus-based diagnostic criteria for MPS, which can then be validated empirically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10741820     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  19 in total

1.  Intra-rater reliability of an experienced physiotherapist in locating myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle.

Authors:  Marco Barbero; Paolo Bertoli; Corrado Cescon; Fiona Macmillan; Fiona Coutts; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-11

2.  The efficacy of an integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique on upper trapezius trigger points in subjects with non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amit V Nagrale; Paul Glynn; Aakanksha Joshi; Gopichand Ramteke
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-03

Review 3.  Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective.

Authors:  Jay P Shah; Nikki Thaker; Juliana Heimur; Jacqueline V Aredo; Siddhartha Sikdar; Lynn Gerber
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Dry needling - peripheral and central considerations.

Authors:  Jan Dommerholt
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-11

5.  Using myoelectric signal parameters to distinguish between computer workers with and without trapezius myalgia.

Authors:  N Goudy; L McLean
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  A randomized, placebo-controlled double-blinded comparative clinical study of five over-the-counter non-pharmacological topical analgesics for myofascial pain: single session findings.

Authors:  Daniel Avrahami; Amanda Hammond; Ceara Higgins; Howard Vernon
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-03-21

7.  Quantitative ultrasound of trapezius muscle involvement in myofascial pain: comparison of clinical and healthy population using texture analysis.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumbhare; Saurabh Shaw; Sara Ahmed; Michael D Noseworthy
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-11-09

8.  Discrepancy between prevalence and perceived effectiveness of treatment methods in myofascial pain syndrome: results of a cross-sectional, nationwide survey.

Authors:  Johannes Fleckenstein; Daniela Zaps; Linda J Rüger; Lukas Lehmeyer; Florentina Freiberg; Philip M Lang; Dominik Irnich
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Disability and related factors in patients with chronic cervical myofascial pain.

Authors:  Burcu Duyur Cakit; Hakan Genç; Vedat Altuntaş; Hatice Rana Erdem
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Recognizing myofascial pelvic pain in the female patient with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Pastore; Wendy B Katzman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.