Literature DB >> 10741275

Two weekly vinorelbine: administration in patients who have received at least two prior chemotherapy regimes for advanced breast cancer.

D I Udom1, D M Vigushin, H Linardou, H Graham, C Palmieri, R C Coombes.   

Abstract

This study examined the response to and toxicity of two weekly vinorelbine administration in patients with at least two prior chemotherapeutic treatments for advanced breast cancer. This single centre study enrolled 20 patients, 19 of whom had received prior taxane treatment for advanced breast cancer. Taxane treatment was in the form of docetaxel for all but 1 patient who had received paclitaxel. All patients had received two or more prior chemotherapeutic regimes for advanced breast carcinoma, including anthracyclines (epirubicin) in 19 patients. Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 two weekly was given for 6 months, until disease progression or toxicity precluded further treatment. 5 earlier studied patients started vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2/week; all changed to the two weekly schedule, limiting the incidence and severity of neutropenia. 7 partial responses (PRs) out of 20 assessable patients (35% overall response rate, 95% confidence interval 15-59%) were noted, all PRs occurring in taxane pretreated patients. The median duration of response was 4 months whilst the median time to progression was 2.75 months. Overall, there were 7 neutropenic events (35%) of 2 week median duration, spanning common toxicity criteria (CTC) grades 1-3 in severity. 5 neutropenia cases (25%) occurred in patients whilst on two weekly vinorelbine. 2 cases (10%) required granulocyte colony stimulating factor support, 1 having had febrile neutropenia (52%). One case of thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity and nausea (each CTC grade 1) were recorded. Although this study involves a small number of cases, these preliminary results suggest that two weekly vinorelbine is effective in heavily pretreated (including taxane pretreated) advanced breast carcinoma. Response is comparable with that of traditionally used weekly regimes, with markedly less toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10741275     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00219-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

Review 1.  Oral vinorelbine: role in the management of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Matti S Aapro; Pierfranco Conte; Emilio Esteban González; Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Phase II study of vinorelbine monotherapy in anthracycline and taxane pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Seo; Hyun Joo Lee; Ok Hee Woo; Kyong Hwa Park; Sang Uk Woo; Dae Sik Yang; Ae-Ree Kim; Jae-Bok Lee; Eun Sook Lee; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Jae Hong Seo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  A randomized feasibility study of docetaxel versus vinorelbine in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Constantine Alifrangis; David Shipway; Tri Tat; Vivienne Watson; Diane Mackie; Marie Emson; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-21

4.  A Phase II trial of the combination of vinorelbine and capecitabine as second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines.

Authors:  George Orphanos; Athanasios Alexopoulos; Savvoula Malliou; George Ioannidis; Alexandros Ardavanis; Constantinos Kandylis; John Stavrakakis; Gerassimos Rigatos
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.