Literature DB >> 10740931

Clinical depression and day-to-day social interaction in a community sample.

J B Nezlek1, C P Hampton, G D Shean.   

Abstract

Adult participants recruited from the community, one half of whom met criteria for clinical depression, described their day-to-day social interactions using a variant of the Rochester Interaction Record. Compared with the nondepressed participants, depressed participants found their interactions to be less enjoyable and less intimate, and they felt less influence over their interactions. Differences between the two groups in intimacy occurred only in interactions with close relations and not in interactions with nonintimates, and differences in influence were more pronounced for those who were cohabiting than for those who were not. There were no differences in how socially active depressed and nondepressed people were or in the amount of contact they had with different relational partners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10740931     DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.109.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  14 in total

1.  Depression and Everyday Social Activity, Belonging, and Well-Being.

Authors:  Michael F Steger; Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2009-04

2.  Prognostic significance of social network, social support and loneliness for course of major depressive disorder in adulthood and old age.

Authors:  R H S van den Brink; N Schutter; D J C Hanssen; B M Elzinga; I M Rabeling-Keus; M L Stek; H C Comijs; B W J H Penninx; R C Oude Voshaar
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 6.892

3.  Interpersonal and emotional experiences of social interactions in borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Stephanie D Stepp; Paul A Pilkonis; Kirsten E Yaggi; Jennifer Q Morse; Ulrike Feske
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Neural and peripheral markers of reward during positive social evaluation are associated with less clinician-rated depression symptom severity in adolescence.

Authors:  Zach J Gray; Grant S Shields; Stassja Sichko; Theresa Q Bui; Meghan Vinograd; Hector A Olvera-Alvarez; George M Slavich
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 5.  The importance of functional impairment to mental health outcomes: a case for reassessing our goals in depression treatment research.

Authors:  Patrick E McKnight; Todd B Kashdan
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-02-07

6.  Inter-individual differences in the experience of negative emotion predict variations in functional brain architecture.

Authors:  Raluca Petrican; Cristina Saverino; R Shayna Rosenbaum; Cheryl Grady
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Measuring impulsivity in daily life: the momentary impulsivity scale.

Authors:  Rachel L Tomko; Marika B Solhan; Ryan W Carpenter; Whitney C Brown; Seungmin Jahng; Phillip K Wood; Timothy J Trull
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-11-25

8.  Relationship between perceived social self-efficacy and depression in adolescents.

Authors:  Zaeema Riaz Ahmad; Saba Yasien; Riaz Ahmad
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci       Date:  2014

9.  Psychosocial Functioning in Depressive Patients: A Comparative Study between Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Affective Disorder.

Authors:  Shubham Mehta; Pankaj Kumar Mittal; Mukesh Kumar Swami
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-13

10.  Exploratory study on the role of emotion regulation in perceived valence, humour, and beneficial use of depressive internet memes in depression.

Authors:  Umair Akram; Jennifer Drabble; Glhenda Cau; Frayer Hershaw; Ashileen Rajenthran; Mollie Lowe; Carissa Trommelen; Jason G Ellis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.