Literature DB >> 10739691

The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.

F D Cirisano1, S J Robboy, R K Dodge, R C Bentley, H R Krigman, I S Synan, J T Soper, D L Clarke-Pearson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare survival and recurrence in clinical and surgical stage I-II papillary serous (PS), clear cell (CC), and endometrioid (EM) cancers of the endometrium and examine the prognostic utility of myometrial invasion.
METHODS: Clinical, surgicopathologic, and survival data were retrospectively collected on 574 clinical stage I-II endometrial cancer patients, including 53 PS and 18 CC (based on postoperative histology), undergoing hysterectomy at Duke University Medical Center between 1967 and 1990. All staging material was available and reexamined prior to this analysis, and FIGO surgical staging was retrospectively assigned. Prognostic variables examined included age, stage, grade, myometrial invasion, lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), and histology. PS and CC histologic subtypes were compared as both common category and discrete categories versus EM, EM grade 1 (EM1), EM grade 2 (EM2), and EM grade 3 (EM3). Statistical analyses were performed using chi(2), Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
RESULTS: PS tumors accounted for 9%, CC for 3%, and EM for 88% of cases. Recurrences were more frequent among PS (38%) and CC (22%) compared with EM (9%) (P < 0.001 and 0.08, respectively), and PS recurred more frequently than EM3 alone (20%) (P = 0.06). Among PS, CC, and EM3 patients with recurrences there were no statistical differences in the proportion that received preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Prognostic factors for shorter survival included age >=60, surgical stage III+IV, presence of LVSI, histology (PS, CC, or EM3), and >=50% myometrial invasion. The estimated 5-year survival of PS+CC patients with <2 mm myometrial invasion is 0.56 compared to 0.93 for EM patients (P < 0. 001). PS + CC tumors confined to the endometrium had a 5-year survival of 0.60 compared to 0.98 and 1.00 for EM and EM3, respectively. The 5-year survival for surgically staged IA patients (0.57) was not different from stages IB and IC combined (0.53) (P = 0.72). The 5-year survival for surgical stage I + II PS + CC patients (0.56) was comparable to that for clinical stage I + II PS + CC patients (0.46) and remained significantly smaller than that for EM patients (0.86) (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Recurrences are more frequent among PS and CC tumors compared with EM and among PS compared with EM3. When controlled for surgical stage I-II tumors, 5-year survival for PS + CC patients remains comparable to that of clinical stage I-II patients and below that of EM. Prognostic factors for survival in PS and CC patients include age, stage, and LVSI. PS, CC, and EM3 subtypes together are predictors of poor survival. Thorough extended surgical staging is indicated in PS and CC tumors, and prospective trials of aggressive adjuvant therapies for surgical stage I-II tumors are needed to improve outcome in PS and CC patients. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739691     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  30 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stages II/III/IV and stages III/IV endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  P Mhawech-Fauceglia; R F Herrmann; J Kesterson; I Izevbaye; S Lele; K Odunsi
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary cytoreductive surgery for stage IV uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Ivy Wilkinson-Ryan; Antonina I Frolova; Jingxia Liu; L Stewart Massad; Premal H Thaker; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Andrea R Hagemann
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Joel L Weissfeld; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium: Evaluation of Prognostic Parameters in a Multi-institutional Cohort of 165 Cases.

Authors:  Eman Abdulfatah; Sharif Sakr; Sumi Thomas; Zaid Al-Wahab; David G Mutch; Sean Dowdy; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Adnan Munkarah; Mohamed Elshaikh; Robert Morris; Rouba Ali-Fehmi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Comparison of outcomes in early-stage uterine clear cell carcinoma and serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Minsi Zhang; T Jonathan Yang; Neil B Desai; Deborah DeLair; Marisa A Kollmeier; Vicky Makker; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Poor prognosis of uterine serous carcinoma compared with grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma in early stage patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Young-Tak Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Dae-Yeon Kim; Insuk Sohn; Shin-Wha Lee; Chang Ohk Sung; Kyu-Rae Kim
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Endometrial stromal sarcoma. Is there a place for radiotherapy?

Authors:  Izaskun Valduvieco; Angeles Rovirosa; Lluis Colomo; Alex De San Juan; Jaume Pahisa; Albert Biete
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Clinical Significance of Serum HE4, CA125, CA724, and CA19-9 in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jing Bian; Xiaoxu Sun; Bo Li; Liang Ming
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 9.  Precursors of endometrial and ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Kurman; Thomas G McConnell
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 10.  American Brachytherapy Task Group Report: Adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Matthew M Harkenrider; Alec M Block; Kaled M Alektiar; David K Gaffney; Ellen Jones; Ann Klopp; Akila N Viswanathan; William Small
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.