Literature DB >> 10739496

First-trimester screening for aneuploidy: research or standard of care?

F D Malone1, R L Berkowitz, J A Canick, M E D'Alton.   

Abstract

First-trimester screening for Down syndrome has been proposed as a significant improvement with respect to second-trimester serum screening programs, the current standard of care, because of apparently higher detection rates and an earlier gestational age at diagnosis. First-trimester nuchal translucency on ultrasonography forms the basis of this new form of screening, although studies of its efficacy have yielded widely conflicting results, with detection rates ranging from 29% to 91%. Studies of first-trimester serum screening with measurements of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin serum concentrations have been much more consistent, with Down syndrome detection rates of 55% to 63% at a 5% false-positive rate. The combination of first-trimester ultrasonographic and serum screening has the potential to yield a Down syndrome detection rate of 80% at a 5% false-positive rate, although this approach has not been adequately studied. There have been no studies performed to date to directly compare the performance of first-trimester and second-trimester methods of screening. Two major trials are underway that will address this issue, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States. Until the results of these trials are available, the current standard of care with respect to Down syndrome screening should not be changed, and first-trimester screening should remain investigational.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739496     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.104802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  2 in total

1.  Ultrasound diagnostic schema for the determination of increased risk for chromosomal fetal aneuploidies in the first half of pregnancy.

Authors:  Piotr Sieroszewski; Małgorzata Perenc; Elzbieta Baś-Budecka; Jacek Suzin
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy--what lies in future?

Authors:  J Mauldin
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.967

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.