Literature DB >> 10739122

Establishing a captive broodstock for the endangered bonytail chub (Gila elegans).

P W Hedrick1, T E Dowling, W L Minckley, C A Tibbets, B D Demarais, P C Marsh.   

Abstract

It is crucial for endangered species to retain as much genetic variation as possible to enhance recovery. Bonytail chub (Gila elegans) is one the most imperiled freshwater fish species, persisting as a declining population of large and old individuals primarily in Lake Mohave on the lower Colorado River. Establishment of a new captive broodstock from the 1981 F1 progeny of at most 10 wild fish plus any newly captured wild fish is evaluated and reviewed. The effective number of founders contributing to the 1981 F1 progeny appears quite small, varying from approximately 3.5, based on F1 allozyme data and supported by mtDNA data, to approximately 8.5, based on the original production records. Using a sample of these progeny to initiate a new broodstock further reduces the effective number of founders. With even the most optimistic evaluation of the amount of genetic variation in F1 progeny, it is obvious that including wild fish in the broodstock is essential to increase the amount of genetic variation. The approach given here could be applied to retain genetic variation in other endangered species in a captive broodstock until they have stable natural populations of adequate size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739122     DOI: 10.1093/jhered/91.1.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hered        ISSN: 0022-1503            Impact factor:   2.645


  3 in total

1.  Selective recovery of founder genetic diversity in aquacultural broodstocks and captive, endangered fish populations.

Authors:  R W Doyle; R Perez-Enriquez; M Takagi; N Taniguchi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.

Authors:  Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Potential drivers of virulence evolution in aquaculture.

Authors:  David A Kennedy; Gael Kurath; Ilana L Brito; Maureen K Purcell; Andrew F Read; James R Winton; Andrew R Wargo
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.183

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.