OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree to which species identification or strain relatedness assessment of successive blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) may improve the clinical diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI). SETTING: 400-bed community hospital. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory survey during which all CNS blood culture isolates obtained between mid-August 1996 and mid-February 1997 (study period) were saved and later identified to the species level; selected isolates were genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrospective review of medical records of 37 patients with multiple cultures positive for CNS. RESULTS: During the study period, 171 patients had blood cultures positive for CNS; 130 had single positive cultures and 41 had > or =2 positive cultures. Of these 41, 23 (62%) were from patients with signs and symptoms of BSI according to CDC surveillance definitions. Species identification and strain clonality of CNS isolates from patients with > or =2 positives revealed 3 (13%) of the 23 patients did not have a consistent CNS species, and another 3 (13%) did not have a consistent genotype in the > or =2 positive cultures, suggesting that CNS from these patients probably were contaminants. Thus, species identification and strain clonality assessment reduced by 27% the number of patients with BSI diagnosed based on the presence of symptoms and > or =2 positive blood cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Routine species identification and selected strain genotyping of CNS may reduce the misinterpretation of probable contaminants among patients with > or =2 positive blood cultures.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the degree to which species identification or strain relatedness assessment of successive blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) may improve the clinical diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI). SETTING: 400-bed community hospital. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory survey during which all CNS blood culture isolates obtained between mid-August 1996 and mid-February 1997 (study period) were saved and later identified to the species level; selected isolates were genotyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Retrospective review of medical records of 37 patients with multiple cultures positive for CNS. RESULTS: During the study period, 171 patients had blood cultures positive for CNS; 130 had single positive cultures and 41 had > or =2 positive cultures. Of these 41, 23 (62%) were from patients with signs and symptoms of BSI according to CDC surveillance definitions. Species identification and strain clonality of CNS isolates from patients with > or =2 positives revealed 3 (13%) of the 23 patients did not have a consistent CNS species, and another 3 (13%) did not have a consistent genotype in the > or =2 positive cultures, suggesting that CNS from these patients probably were contaminants. Thus, species identification and strain clonality assessment reduced by 27% the number of patients with BSI diagnosed based on the presence of symptoms and > or =2 positive blood cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Routine species identification and selected strain genotyping of CNS may reduce the misinterpretation of probable contaminants among patients with > or =2 positive blood cultures.
Authors: Aine Skow; Kathy A Mangold; Mohammed Tajuddin; Anne Huntington; Brett Fritz; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Naomi Jean-Baptiste; Daniel K Benjamin; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Vance G Fowler; Matthew Laughon; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 26.132