Literature DB >> 10738960

Further evaluation of low-ranked items in stimulus-choice preference assessments.

C C Taravella1, D C Lerman, S A Contrucci, H S Roane.   

Abstract

The generality of the findings reported by DeLeon, Iwata, and Roscoe (1997) was examined by conducting two stimulus-choice preference assessments, the second of which evaluated low-ranked items from the initial assessment. Results for the 2 participants suggested that supplementary assessments of low-ranked items may be useful for identifying a wider variety of reinforcing stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738960      PMCID: PMC1284230          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  7 in total

1.  On the relation between reinforcer efficacy and preference.

Authors:  May S H Lee; C T Yu; Toby L Martin; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03

2.  Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Monica T Francisco; John C Borrero; Jolene R Sy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.

Authors:  Ashley C Glover; Henry S Roane; Heather J Kadey; Laura L Grow
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2008

4.  Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.

Authors:  Edward J Daly; Nikki J Wells; Michelle S Swanger-Gagné; James E Carr; Gina M Kunz; Ashley M Taylor
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

5.  A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Allison Levy; Iser G DeLeon; Catherine K Martinez; Nathalie Fernandez; Nicholas A Gage; Sigurdur Óli Sigurdsson; Michelle A Frank-Crawford
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-10-14

6.  The Role of Context in the Evaluation of Reinforcer Efficacy: Implications for the Preference Assessment Outcomes.

Authors:  Aphrodite Mangum; Henry Roane; Laura Fredrick; Robert Pabico
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2012-01

7.  The impact of high- and low-preference stimuli on vocational and academic performances of youths with severe disabilities.

Authors:  Richard B Graff; Lenwood Gibson; G Tracey Galiatsatos
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.