Literature DB >> 10738868

Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients.

N Adachi1, M Ochi, Y Uchio, Y Sumen.   

Abstract

We present a new surgical technique of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmentation using autogenous hamstring tendons or allogenic fascia lata under arthroscopy for patients in whom considerable ACL remnants with mechanoreceptors are preserved. We review the clinical results of 40 patients who underwent this ACL augmentation, as assessed by manual instability tests, KT-2000 knee arthrometer, Lysholm and Gillquist score, joint position sense and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and compare them with those of ACL reconstruction. The side-to-side differences of anterior displacement measured by the KT-2000 knee arthrometer at 30 lbs, an average of 5.3 +/- 2.6 mm preoperatively, was significantly improved to an average of 0.7 +/- 1.8 mm in the augmentation group, while an average of 6.0 +/- 2.4 mm was improved to 1.8 +/- 2.1 mm in the reconstruction group. There was no statistically significant difference between the preoperative values in the two groups, but the postoperative values of the augmentation group were significantly less than those of the reconstruction group. The ratio of anterior terminal stiffness of the augmentation group was 1.2 +/- 1.8, and that of the ACL reconstruction group was 0.7 +/- 0.4. This was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Thus, as for the KT-2000 knee arthrometer, the ACL augmentation group showed significantly better anteroposterior stability and terminal stiffness than the ACL reconstruction group. The final inaccuracy of joint position sense of the augmentation group was 0.7 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees, while that of the reconstruction group was 1.7 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees indicating a significant difference (P < 0.05). This study demonstrates that ACL augmentation, which can preserve ACL remnants with mechanoreceptors, is superior to ACL reconstruction from the viewpoint of position sense and joint stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738868     DOI: 10.1007/s004020050028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  60 in total

1.  Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single-bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques.

Authors:  Jihoon Cha; Sang-Hee Choi; Jong Won Kwon; Sang-Hak Lee; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joon Ho Wang; Jae Gyoon Kim; Do Kyung Lee; Hong Chul Lim; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Quantitative comparison of the pivot shift test results before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by using the three-dimensional electromagnetic measurement system.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Yuichi Hoshino; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Preoperative assessments completed for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with remnant preservation.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Kubota; Hiroshi Ikeda; Yuji Takazawa; Muneaki Ishijima; Yoshitomo Saita; Haruka Kaneko; Sung-Gong Kim; Hisashi Kurosawa; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-06-14

5.  Temporal change of joint position sense after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using multi-stranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Nobuo Adachi; Mitsuo Ochi; Yuji Uchio; Junji Iwasa; Masakazu Ishikawa; Rikuo Shinomiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  CORR Insights®: how useful is MRI in diagnosing isolated bundle ACL injuries?

Authors:  Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Young Bok Jung; Min Ku Song; Sang Hak Lee; Ho Joong Jung; Han Jun Lee; Hyoung Seok Jung; Hawa-Tahir Siti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of anatomic ACL reconstruction between selective bundle reconstruction and double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Shin Woo Nam; Jae Ang Sim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Clinical outcomes of remnant preserving augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Jin Qu; Daqi Xu; Tao Zhang; Jingyong Zhou; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Efficacy of immunohistological methods in detecting functionally viable mechanoreceptors in the remnant stumps of injured anterior cruciate ligaments and its clinical importance.

Authors:  Kamal Bali; Mandeep S Dhillon; R K Vasistha; Nandita Kakkar; Rishi Chana; Sharad Prabhakar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.