Literature DB >> 10738127

What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre?

J Ling1, E Rees, J Hardy.   

Abstract

Like any other specialty, palliative care needs a scientific foundation on which to base its practice. Research in palliative care is particularly difficult because of the characteristics of the patient population under study (e.g. advanced disease, poor performance status and limited prognosis). The aim of this paper was to highlight the challenges of recruitment into clinical trials in palliative care. Information on all patients treated at a specialist cancer centre who were referred for consideration of entry into any one of 23 clinical trials in palliative care was collected prospectively over 4 years to determine factors that influence patients to accept or reject entry into a study. Of the 1206 patients referred, 558 (46%) met the entry criteria. Of these, 362 (30%) agreed to enter and 248 (21% of all those referred) completed the study. Thus, 65% of all eligible patients were entered into trials but only 44% of these completed the study. The relatively high percentage of patients entered probably reflects the site (a cancer centre with a high research profile) and is not typical of other palliative care centres or hospices. The most common reasons given for unwillingness to participate were a wish to defer to a later date, a deterioration in condition, distance from home to hospital, a lack of interest, transfer to another unit, inability to give consent and family objection. In order to maximise patient accrual into trials in palliative care, studies should be designed to suit the patient population under study (e.g. be of short duration with realistic entry criteria) and not necessarily mirror the trial methodology of therapeutic trials in oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738127     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00330-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  28 in total

1.  Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Hayley A Pessin; Julia N Radomski; N Simay Gökbayrak; Aviva M Katz; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Quantity, design, and scope of the palliative oncology literature.

Authors:  David Hui; Henrique A Parsons; Shamsha Damani; Stephanie Fulton; Jun Liu; Avery Evans; Maxine De La Cruz; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-04-06

3.  Assessment of self-selection bias in a pediatric unilateral hearing loss study.

Authors:  Judith E C Lieu; Karuna Dewan
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Reginald Heywood; Alexandra L McCarthy; Tina L Skinner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Attitudinal barriers to participation in oncology clinical trials: factor analysis and correlates of barriers.

Authors:  S Manne; D Kashy; T Albrecht; Y-N Wong; A Lederman Flamm; A B Benson; S M Miller; Linda Fleisher; J Buzaglo; N Roach; M Katz; E Ross; M Collins; D Poole; S Raivitch; D M Miller; T G Kinzy; T Liu; N J Meropol
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Research participation by older adults at end of life: barriers and solutions.

Authors:  Melissa Lehan Mackin; Keela Herr; Kimberly Bergen-Jackson; Perry Fine; Chris Forcucci; Sara Sanders
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 1.571

Review 8.  What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?-a systematic review.

Authors:  Clare White; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Novel consent process for research in dying patients unable to give consent.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rees; Janet Hardy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

10.  A survey of the views of palliative care healthcare professionals towards referring cancer patients to participate in randomized controlled trials in palliative care.

Authors:  Clare White; Kristen Gilshenan; Janet Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.