Luminance spatial frequency differences facilitate the segmentation of superimposed textures.

Do superimposed textures segregate on the basis of a difference in their luminance spatial frequency? We addressed this question using orientation-gratings, which consist of dense arrays of Gabor micropatterns whose orientations vary sinusoidally across space. Two orientation gratings of the same texture spatial frequency were combined in anti-phase, to produce a 'dual-modulation' orientation grating. Thresholds for detecting the dual-modulation gratings were measured as a function of the difference in Gabor spatial frequency between the two grating components. When the two components were made from the same Gabors, thresholds were relatively high. However a one octave difference in Gabor spatial frequency between the components caused thresholds to fall close to those of single-modulation orientation gratings. The fall in threshold was accompanied by a change in appearance of the stimulus; to that of two transparent, interwoven, flow patterns. We show that these results are incompatible with current Filter-Rectify-Filter models of 'second-order' pattern detection. Rather, they favour the idea that feature analysis precedes texture analysis, with the visual system encoding local orientation content prior to the texture stage.