A C King1, L A Pruitt, W Phillips, R Oka, A Rodenburg, W L Haskell. 1. Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California 94304-1583, USA. king@scrdp.stanford.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although inactivity is an important contributor to impaired functioning and disability with age, little is known concerning how improvements in physical functioning and well-being in older adults vary with the type of physical activity undertaken. METHODS:One hundred three adults age 65 years and older, recruited via population-based methods, were randomized to 12 months of community-based, moderate-intensity endurance and strengthening exercises (Fit & Firm) or stretching and flexibility exercises (Stretch & Flex). A combination of class- and home-based exercise formats was used. Measured and self-rated physical performance along with perceived functioning and well-being were assessed pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: Fit & Firm subjects showed greater 12-month improvements in both measured and self-rated endurance and strength compared to Stretch & Flex subjects. Stretch & Flex subjects reported greater improvements in bodily pain, and Stretch & Flex men evidenced greater improvements in flexibility relative to Fit & Firm subjects. Although overall exercise adherence was high in both exercise conditions (approximately 80%), subjects in both conditions showed better adherence to the home- versus class-based portions of their exercise prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS:Community-based programs focusing on moderate-intensity endurance and strengthening exercises or flexibility exercises can be delivered through a combination of formats that result in improvement in important functional and well-being outcomes. This represents one of the first studies to report significant improvements in an important quality of life outcome-bodily pain-with a regular regimen of stretching and flexibility exercises in a community-based sample of older adults.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although inactivity is an important contributor to impaired functioning and disability with age, little is known concerning how improvements in physical functioning and well-being in older adults vary with the type of physical activity undertaken. METHODS: One hundred three adults age 65 years and older, recruited via population-based methods, were randomized to 12 months of community-based, moderate-intensity endurance and strengthening exercises (Fit & Firm) or stretching and flexibility exercises (Stretch & Flex). A combination of class- and home-based exercise formats was used. Measured and self-rated physical performance along with perceived functioning and well-being were assessed pre- and postintervention. RESULTS: Fit & Firm subjects showed greater 12-month improvements in both measured and self-rated endurance and strength compared to Stretch & Flex subjects. Stretch & Flex subjects reported greater improvements in bodily pain, and Stretch & Flex men evidenced greater improvements in flexibility relative to Fit & Firm subjects. Although overall exercise adherence was high in both exercise conditions (approximately 80%), subjects in both conditions showed better adherence to the home- versus class-based portions of their exercise prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based programs focusing on moderate-intensity endurance and strengthening exercises or flexibility exercises can be delivered through a combination of formats that result in improvement in important functional and well-being outcomes. This represents one of the first studies to report significant improvements in an important quality of life outcome-bodily pain-with a regular regimen of stretching and flexibility exercises in a community-based sample of older adults.
Authors: William A Satariano; Jack M Guralnik; Richard J Jackson; Richard A Marottoli; Elizabeth A Phelan; Thomas R Prohaska Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sara Wilcox; Marilyn Laken; Allen W Parrott; Margaret Condrasky; Ruth Saunders; Cheryl L Addy; Rebecca Evans; Meghan Baruth; May Samuel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Vicki A Freedman; Nancy Hodgson; Joanne Lynn; Brenda C Spillman; Timothy Waidmann; Anne M Wilkinson; Douglas A Wolf Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Audie A Atienza; Amy L Yaroch; Louise C Mãsse; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse; Abby C King Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul A Estabrooks; Renae L Smith-Ray; David A Dzewaltowski; Diane Dowdy; Diana Lattimore; Carol Rheaume; Marcia G Ory; Terry Bazzarre; Sarah F Griffin; Sara Wilcox Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Deborah Parra-Medina; Sara Wilcox; Dawn K Wilson; Cheryl L Addy; Gwen Felton; Mary Beth Poston Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Abby C King; David K Ahn; Brian M Oliveira; Audie A Atienza; Cynthia M Castro; Christopher D Gardner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 5.043