Literature DB >> 10737530

Comparison of flaps versus grafts in proximal hypospadias surgery.

C R Powell1, I Mcaleer, M Alagiri, G W Kaplan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the complication rate in patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair using preputial skin as a flap or free graft.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 142 patients who underwent proximal hypospadias repair. Repairs were subdivided into tubed and onlay repairs within the flap and free graft groups. We analyzed postoperative complications, including fistulas, proximal strictures, diverticula and meatal stenosis.
RESULTS: Median patient age at followup was 11.3 months and median followup was 9.4 months. Two-thirds of the repairs were performed with free grafts. A proximal stricture developed in 8 and 0 patients who underwent free tubed graft and free onlay repair, respectively (p = 0.047). Otherwise there was no significant difference in the complication rate of the various types of repair. Of the 43 patients who had stricture, fistula or meatal stenosis 29 (67%) presented more than 1 year after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In repairs performed with free grafts there is a significantly higher proximal stricture rate when a tube rather than an onlay is used. Otherwise we noted no significant difference in the complication rates of flaps and grafts used to repair proximal hypospadias. A significant number of complications presented more than 1 year postoperatively and they may even present as late as 4 years. This finding suggests that longer followup may be necessary to assess completely the outcome of proximal hypospadias surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10737530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Hypospadias repair: an overview of the actual techniques.

Authors:  Ramnath Subramaniam; Anne Francoise Spinoit; Piet Hoebeke
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Two-stage repair for proximal hypospadias: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Saul P Greenfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.862

3.  Two-stage repair in hypospadias.

Authors:  K N Haxhirexha; M Castagnetti; W Rigamonti; G A Manzoni
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04

4.  Acute postoperative complications of hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Amilal Bhat; Arup Kumar Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04

Review 5.  Management of the patient with failed hypospadias surgery presenting in adulthood.

Authors:  Reem Aldamanhori; Christopher R Chapple
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-10-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.