Literature DB >> 10736582

Lot quality assurance sampling for monitoring immunization coverage in Madras City.

B N Murthy1, S Radhakrishna, S Venkatasubramanian, V Periannan, A Lakshmi, V Joshua, R Sudha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the usefulness of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) to identify divisions in a city that had immunization coverage levels of 80% for any of the four EPI vaccines.
METHODS: Only 43 divisions were considered for the study, the stratification factor being the death rate. The hypothesis that 80% coverage is 'unacceptable' was stipulated. Critical value (the number of unimmunized children) was chosen as 3. A simple random sample of 36 children in the age-group 12-23 months was taken from each selected division. Since sampling frames of children were not available, a simple random sample of 36 households was selected. Immunization status of each child was assessed by interviewing the child's mother/guardian. If the number of unimmunized children exceeded 3, then the division was regarded having coverage level 80% and rejected.
RESULTS: The coverage was classified as unacceptable(i. e., below 80%) in 19 divisions for Polio and DPT vaccines, in 26 divisions for Measles vaccine and in 4 divisions for BCG vaccine. The average time spent for undertaking the LQAS survey was 6 man-days per division.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the utility of the LQAS technique in identifying 'unsatisfactory' pockets in Madras City, when the overall coverage was satisfactory. The technique will have greater application with an increase in the number of large units (cities/districts) having an overall coverage of 90% or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10736582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   1.411


  6 in total

1.  [Acceptance of lot sampling: its applicability to the evaluation of the primary care services portfolio].

Authors:  J López-Picazo Ferrer
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  Are census data accurate for estimating coverage of a lymphatic filariasis MDA campaign? Results of a survey in Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Wogba Kamara; Kathryn L Zoerhoff; Emily H Toubali; Mary H Hodges; Donal Bisanzio; Dhuly Chowdhury; Mustapha Sonnie; Edward Magbity; Mohamed Samai; Abdulai Conteh; Florence Macarthy; Margaret Baker; Joseph B Koroma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prevalence study of yaws in the Democratic Republic of Congo using the lot quality assurance sampling method.

Authors:  Sibylle Gerstl; Gédeon Kiwila; Mehul Dhorda; Sylvaine Lonlas; Mark Myatt; Benoît Kebela Ilunga; Denis Lemasson; Elisabeth Szumilin; Philippe J Guerin; Laurent Ferradini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of primary immunization coverage of infants under universal immunization programme in an urban area of bangalore city using cluster sampling and lot quality assurance sampling techniques.

Authors:  Punith K; Lalitha K; Suman G; Pradeep Bs; Jayanth Kumar K
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2008-07

5.  Evaluation of immunization coverage in the rural area of pune, maharashtra, using the 30 cluster sampling technique.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Gupta; Prasad Pore; Usha Patil
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2013-01

6.  Vaccination coverage of children aged 12-23 months in Gaziantep, Turkey: comparative results of two studies carried out by lot quality technique: what changed after family medicine?

Authors:  Birgul Ozcirpici; Neriman Aydin; Ferhat Coskun; Hakan Tuzun; Servet Ozgur
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.