Literature DB >> 10736494

Antibacterial mesh sling: a prospective outcome analysis.

J M Choe1, K Ogan, S Bennett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the outcome results of the Gore-Tex antibacterial mesh sling in women with pelvic prolapse and stress incontinence.
METHODS: Between July 1997 and November 1998, 30 women with stress incontinence and vaginal prolapse underwent vaginal reconstruction with the antibacterial mesh sling. All patients had documented stress incontinence by preoperative urodynamic evaluation. Postoperatively, we conducted an outcome analysis on the basis of the results from a self-reported satisfaction questionnaire, a detailed pelvic examination, a cough stress test, and the Q-tip test. Urodynamic studies were performed on patients with persistent stress incontinence or urge symptoms. Cystoscopy was performed on patients suspected of having urethral erosion.
RESULTS: Complete follow-up was available for all 30 patients. Of the group, 12 (40.0%) of 30 underwent implantation of the antibacterial mesh sling alone and 18 (60.0%) underwent additional prolapse repair. The mean follow-up was 18 months (range 9 to 24); mean age was 58 years (range 29 to 87). Stress incontinence was cured in 28 (93.3%) of 30 patients. De novo urge incontinence developed in 1 (5.2%) of 18 patients; urge symptoms persisted in 5 (41.7%) of 12 patients. The postoperative mean Valsalva Q-tip angle was 15 degrees (range 0 degrees to 25 degrees ). The incidence of urethral obstruction and erosion was zero. The mean postoperative pain score was 3 of 10 (range 0 to 6), and the mean satisfaction score was 9 of 10 (range 7 to 10). The mean time to discharge was 21 hours (range 6 to 29). All 30 women (100%) were willing to undergo surgery again.
CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of the Gore-Tex antibacterial mesh is better than that of the conventional Gore-Tex sling. When meticulous surgical technique is used, excellent short-term results can be achieved in the correction of female stress incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10736494     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00552-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nonautologous sling materials.

Authors:  G M Ghoniem; D S Kapoor
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Result of the tension-free vaginal tape in patients with concomitant prolapse surgery: a 2-year follow-up study. An analysis from the Netherlands TVT database.

Authors:  Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Tanya M Bisseling; H Jorien van Brummen; A Peter M Heintz; Harry A M Vervest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-08-15

Review 3.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Complications from vaginally placed mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roberta E Blandon; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco; Christopher J Klingele
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-02-10

Review 5.  Complications related to use of mesh implants in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: infection or inflammation?

Authors:  Naşide Mangir; Sabiniano Roman; Christopher R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.