Literature DB >> 10735991

One explanation for the variability of the bacterial suspension test.

M D Johnston1, E A Simons, R J Lambert.   

Abstract

Disinfection kinetic studies of sodium dodecyl sulphate, benzalkonium chloride and sodium hypochlorite against Staphylococcus aureus revealed that when a higher inoculum level of Staph. aureus than normal was used (approximately 1 log higher), the efficacy of disinfection was severely attenuated. Kinetic analysis using the Hom model for experiments carried out on tests using 3 x 108 organisms ml-1 were unable to account for the large increase in disinfection power observed when smaller inoculum levels were used. Since the inoculum was the same in every way except for the numbers used, the large variations in the log reduction/time curves could not be explained by a variation in the resistance of the population to the biocide, as identical log reduction-time curves should have resulted. The level of disinfection achieved for a given concentration of biocide was found to be approximately linearly related to the cell number ml-1 of test solution and not to the log number. The variation observed is believed to occur due to intrinsic self-quenching of the biocide by the microbes during the course of the disinfection test. As the level of free biocide decreases, the rate of reaction decreases, giving the tails of the log reduction/time curves. Such intrinsic self-quenching could explain the large variations known to occur in the legally required disinfection suspension tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735991     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00951.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  3 in total

1.  Listeria monocytogenes Strains Underrepresented during Selective Enrichment with an ISO Method Might Dominate during Passage through Simulated Gastric Fluid and In Vitro Infection of Caco-2 Cells.

Authors:  Evangelia Zilelidou; Christina-Vasiliki Karmiri; Georgia Zoumpopoulou; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Dimitris Kletsas; Effie Tsakalidou; Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Eleftherios Drosinos; Panagiotis Skandamis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  In vitro and ex vivo testing of alternative disinfectants to currently used more harmful substances in footbaths against Dichelobacter nodosus.

Authors:  Tobias Hidber; Urs Pauli; Adrian Steiner; Peter Kuhnert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Surfactants as Antimicrobials: A Brief Overview of Microbial Interfacial Chemistry and Surfactant Antimicrobial Activity.

Authors:  Nancy A Falk
Journal:  J Surfactants Deterg       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.902

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.