Literature DB >> 10735905

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer.

A C Wolff1, N E Davidson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laboratory studies suggest that primary systemic therapy (PST) could improve control of micrometastatic disease and impact on overall survival (OS). This article examines the rationale for and preclinical and clinical data of PST in operable breast cancer and the potential role of intermediate biomarkers as predictive and/or prognostic factors for response and survival. DESIGN AND
METHOD: We conducted an extensive literative review (including MEDLINE) on preclinical studies, single-arm feasibility studies, large randomized single- and multi-institutional trials, and laboratory correlate studies of PST in breast cancer.
RESULTS: Small trials in locally advanced disease showed high initial rates of response and local control. Six randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of PST for palpable, operable breast cancer have been reported since 1991 (from 204 to 1,523 patients each). These data clearly show a small but significant (less than 10%) absolute increase in the use of breast-conservation treatment (BCT) with similar rates of local control. Although one study showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and another showed better OS, most studies did not show any survival advantage of primary versus adjuvant systemic therapy. Thus far, pathologic complete response seems to be the best predictor of survival, but clinical response assessment correlates poorly with pathologic response. Pilot studies demonstrated feasibility of procuring tissue at diagnosis and after treatment for assays of potential intermediate biomarkers. Initial data suggest a potential correlation between markers of proliferation and apoptosis and in vivo chemotherapy sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Thus far, RCTs of PST versus standard adjuvant therapy have not shown any clear benefit for DFS or OS in early breast cancer. Ongoing trials should determine if specific subsets of patients at risk would benefit from additional systemic therapy and the potential role of intermediate biomarkers in identifying such women. Although PST results in a small increase in the rate of BCT with similar rates of local control, current PST strategies should not replace standard adjuvant approaches. Rather, they represent an acceptable alternative to women with palpable, operable tumors and an excellent arena for clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735905     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.7.1558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

Review 1.  Studies of apoptosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  M Parton; M Dowsett; I Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

2.  Clinical and pathological predictors of the response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mónica Fernández-Sánchez; Armando Gamboa-Dominguez; Norma Uribe; Ana Cristina García-Ulloa; Diana Flores-Estrada; Myrna Candelaria; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Accuracy of ultrasonography and mammography in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Keune; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman; Abigail Hoffman; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Treatment options for surgically resectable gastric cancer.

Authors:  Lakshmi Rajdev
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2010-06

5.  Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of a protein kinase Cbeta inhibitor in human breast cancer and ovarian cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Beverly A Teicher; Krishna Menon; Enrique Alvarez; Chuan Shih; Margaret M Faul
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Analysis of functional germline polymorphisms for prediction of response to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Szkandera; Gudrun Absenger; Nadia Dandachi; Peter Regitnig; Sigurd Lax; Michael Stotz; Hellmut Samonigg; Wilfried Renner; Armin Gerger
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 15. Treatment for women with stage III or locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Shenkier; Lorna Weir; Mark Levine; Ivo Olivotto; Timothy Whelan; Leonard Reyno
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J S D Mieog; J A van der Hage; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

9.  Prediction and prognosis: impact of gene expression profiling in personalized treatment of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael R Mallmann; Andrea Staratschek-Jox; Christian Rudlowski; Michael Braun; Andrea Gaarz; Matthias Wolfgarten; Walther Kuhn; Joachim L Schultze
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Tumor slices as a model to evaluate doxorubicin in vitro treatment and expression of trios of genes PRSS11, MTSS1, CLPTM1 and PRSS11, MTSS1, SMYD2 in canine mammary gland cancer.

Authors:  Renata A Sobral; Suzana T Honda; Maria Lucia H Katayama; Helena Brentani; M Mitzi Brentani; Diogo F C Patrão; Maria Aparecida A K Folgueira
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 1.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.