Literature DB >> 10735901

Hypersensitivity or development of antibodies to asparaginase does not impact treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

M H Woo1, L J Hak, M C Storm, J T Sandlund, R C Ribeiro, G K Rivera, J E Rubnitz, P L Harrison, B Wang, W E Evans, C H Pui, M V Relling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Development of antibodies and hypersensitivity to asparaginase are common and may attenuate asparaginase effect. Our aim was to determine the relationship between antiasparaginase antibodies or hypersensitivity reactions and event-free survival (EFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-four children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia received Escherichia coli asparaginase 10,000 IU/m(2) intramuscularly three times weekly for nine doses during multiagent induction and reinduction phases and for seven monthly doses during continuation treatment. Erwinia asparaginase was used in case of clinical hypersensitivity to E coli but not for subclinical development of antibodies. Plasma antiasparaginase antibody concentrations were measured on day 29 of induction in 152 patients.
RESULTS: Antibodies were detectable in 54 patients (35.5%), of whom 30 (55.6%) exhibited hypersensitivity to asparaginase. Of the 98 patients who had no detectable antibodies, 18 (18.4%) had allergic reactions. Patients with antibodies were more likely to have a reaction than those without antibodies (P <.001). Among the 50 patients who experienced allergic reactions (including two for whom antibodies were not measured), 36 (72.0%) were subsequently given Erwinia asparaginase; seven (19.4%) reacted to this preparation. EFS did not differ among patients who did and did not have antibodies (P =.54), with 4-year EFS (+/- 1 SE) of 83% +/- 6% and 76% +/- 5%, respectively. Similarly, EFS did not differ among patients who did and did not develop allergic reactions (P =.68), with 4-year estimates of 82% +/- 6% and 78% +/- 5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this setting, in which most patients with allergy were switched to another preparation, there was no adverse prognostic impact of clinical or subclinical allergy to asparaginase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735901     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.7.1525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  41 in total

1.  Polyethylene Glycol-conjugated L-asparaginase versus native L-asparaginase in combination with standard agents for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second bone marrow relapse: a Children's Oncology Group Study (POG 8866).

Authors:  Joanne Kurtzberg; Barbara Asselin; Mark Bernstein; George R Buchanan; Brad H Pollock; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.289

2.  Clinical utility and implications of asparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C Liu; J D Kawedia; C Cheng; D Pei; C A Fernandez; X Cai; K R Crews; S C Kaste; J C Panetta; W P Bowman; S Jeha; J T Sandlund; W E Evans; C-H Pui; M V Relling
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Pharmacogenomics in pediatric leukemia.

Authors:  Steven W Paugh; Gabriele Stocco; William E Evans
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Development of an ELISA to detect circulating anti-asparaginase antibodies in dogs with lymphoid neoplasia treated with Escherichia coli l-asparaginase.

Authors:  J A Kidd; P Ross; A S Buntzman; P R Hess
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.613

5.  Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation.

Authors:  Inge M van der Sluis; Lynda M Vrooman; Rob Pieters; Andre Baruchel; Gabriele Escherich; Nicholas Goulden; Veerle Mondelaers; Jose Sanchez de Toledo; Carmelo Rizzari; Lewis B Silverman; James A Whitlock
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Genetic variations in GRIA1 on chromosome 5q33 related to asparaginase hypersensitivity.

Authors:  S-H Chen; D Pei; W Yang; C Cheng; S Jeha; N J Cox; W E Evans; C-H Pui; M V Relling
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Intravenous PEG-asparaginase during remission induction in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Lewis B Silverman; Jeffrey G Supko; Kristen E Stevenson; Christina Woodward; Lynda M Vrooman; Donna S Neuberg; Barbara L Asselin; Uma H Athale; Luis Clavell; Peter D Cole; Kara M Kelly; Caroline Laverdière; Bruno Michon; Marshall Schorin; Cindy L Schwartz; Jane E O'Brien; Harvey J Cohen; Stephen E Sallan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity reaction rates (grade ≥3) with intravenous infusion vs. intramuscular injection: analysis of 54,280 doses administered to 16,534 patients on children's oncology group (COG) clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael J Burke; Meenakshi Devidas; Kelly Maloney; Anne Angiolillo; Reuven Schore; Kimberly Dunsmore; Eric Larsen; Len A Mattano; Wanda Salzer; Stuart S Winter; William Carroll; Naomi J Winick; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth Raetz; Stephen P Hunger; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 9.  Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs.

Authors:  Gillian M Shepherd
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.667

10.  First-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with pegasparaginase.

Authors:  Riccardo Masetti; Andrea Pession
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.