Literature DB >> 10735894

p53 alterations predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective series.

A Cabelguenne1, H Blons, I de Waziers, F Carnot, A M Houllier, T Soussi, D Brasnu, P Beaune, O Laccourreye, P Laurent-Puig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The tumor suppressor gene p53 plays a crucial role in cell cycle control and apoptosis in response to DNA damages. p53 gene mutations and allelic losses at 17p are one of the most common genetic alterations in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Alterations of the p53 gene have been shown to contribute to carcinogenesis and drug resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective series, patients with HNSCC were treated with cisplatin-fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p53 status was characterized in 106 patients with HNSCC (p53 mutations, allelic losses at p53 locus, and plasma anti-p53 antibodies) to determine the existence of a relationship between p53 gene status and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Exons 4 to 9 of the p53 gene were analyzed, and mutations were found in 72 of 106 patients with HNSCC. p53 mutations were associated with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 17p (P <.001). The prevalence of p53-mutated tumors was higher in the group of patients with nonresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than in the group of responders (81% v 61%, respectively; P <.04). When compiling p53 mutations and anti-p53 antibodies in plasma, the correlation between p53 status and response to chemotherapy was significant (87% v 57%, respectively; P =.003). A multivariate analysis showed that p53 status is an independent predictive factor of response to chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: This prospective study suggests that p53 status may be a useful indicator of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HNSCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735894     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.7.1465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  Novel biomarker panel predicts prognosis in human papillomavirus-negative oropharyngeal cancer: an analysis of the TAX 324 trial.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Marshall R Posner; Lisa M Schumaker; Nikolaos Nikitakis; Olga Goloubeva; Ming Tan; Changwan Lu; Sana Iqbal; Jochen Lorch; Nicholas J Sarlis; Robert I Haddad; Kevin J Cullen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Frequent deletion of ING2 locus at 4q35.1 associates with advanced tumor stage in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Silvia S Borkosky; Mehmet Gunduz; Hitoshi Nagatsuka; Levent Bekir Beder; Esra Gunduz; Mahmoud A L Sheikh Ali; Andrea P Rodriguez; Mehmet Zeynel Cilek; Susumu Tominaga; Noboru Yamanaka; Kenji Shimizu; Noriyuki Nagai
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  P53/PUMA are potential targets that mediate the protection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/TrkB from etoposide-induced cell death in neuroblastoma (NB).

Authors:  Zhongyan Hua; Yue Zhan; Simeng Zhang; Yudi Dong; Min Jiang; Fei Tan; Zhihui Liu; Carol J Thiele; Zhijie Li
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The Expression of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Genes in Head and Neck Cancer as Possible Predictive Factors.

Authors:  Orsolya Rusz; Margit Pál; Éva Szilágyi; László Rovó; Zoltán Varga; Bernadett Tomisa; Gabriella Fábián; Levente Kovács; Olga Nagy; Petra Mózes; Zita Reisz; László Tiszlavicz; Péter Deák; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Mutational Status of CDKN2A and TP53 Genes in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Teodora A Todorova; Stanislav H Jordanov; Gergana S Stancheva; Ivan J Chalakov; Mincho B Melnicharov; Kuncho V Kunev; Vanio I Mitev; Radka P Kaneva; Teodora E Goranova
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Differential biomarker expression in head and neck cancer correlates with anatomical localization.

Authors:  László Tamás; Gabriella Szentkúti; Mónika Eros; Kornél Dános; Diána Brauswetter; Béla Szende; Ivett Zsákovics; Tibor Krenács
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Frequent intragenic rearrangements of DPYD in colorectal tumours.

Authors:  A B P van Kuilenburg; M-C Etienne-Grimaldi; A Mahamat; J Meijer; P Laurent-Puig; S Olschwang; M-P Gaub; R C M Hennekam; D Benchimol; S Houry; C Letoublon; F-N Gilly; D Pezet; T Andre; J-L Faucheron; A Abderrahim-Ferkoune; R Vijzelaar; B Pradere; G Milano
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.550

8.  The MDM2 promoter polymorphism SNP309T-->G and the risk of uterine leiomyosarcoma, colorectal cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  P Alhopuro; S K Ylisaukko-Oja; W J Koskinen; P Bono; J Arola; H J Järvinen; J-P Mecklin; T Atula; R Kontio; A A Mäkitie; S Suominen; I Leivo; P Vahteristo; L-M Aaltonen; L A Aaltonen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  Lessons learned from next-generation sequencing in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Myriam Loyo; Ryan J Li; Chetan Bettegowda; Curtis R Pickering; Mitchell J Frederick; Jeffrey N Myers; Nishant Agrawal
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 10.  Molecular techniques and genetic alterations in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick K Ha; Steven S Chang; Chad A Glazer; Joseph A Califano; David Sidransky
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.