Literature DB >> 10735835

Does height influence progression through primary school grades?

M Wake1, D Coghlan, K Hesketh.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine the relation between a child's height and grade progression in primary school.
METHODS: Height was measured in a representative cross sectional sample of children from 24 primary schools in Victoria in late 1997. Height measurements were transformed to standardised scores using Cole's "LMS" method to allow for comparison across ages and genders. Children within each grade were divided into three equal groups based on age (youngest third, middle third, oldest third), again to allow for cross age comparison.
RESULTS: A total of 2848 children aged 5-12 years (51% male) were included, with approximately 400 children in each of the seven grades from preparatory to grade 6. Analysis of variance showed a significant relation overall between age and height, with a sequential decrease in height from the youngest to the oldest third. When genders were considered separately, the relation remained significant for boys but not for girls. A total of 133 children (66% male) repeated a grade in primary school. When this group of grade repeaters was removed from the sample, analysis of variance showed no significant relation between standardised height score and age tertile for boys. Although birth weight category and maternal education were independent predictors of height scores overall, they did not appear to influence decisions to retain pupils in grades.
CONCLUSIONS: Older boys within grades, notably those who have repeated a grade, are shorter than their peers. Decisions to retain pupils, particularly boys who are experiencing school difficulties, may be influenced by their height.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735835      PMCID: PMC1718276          DOI: 10.1136/adc.82.4.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  15 in total

Review 1.  The social cost of being short: societal perceptions and biases.

Authors:  L E Underwood
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1991

Review 2.  The disability of short stature.

Authors:  C M Law
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Growth and intellectual development.

Authors:  D M Wilson; L D Hammer; P M Duncan; S M Dornbusch; P L Ritter; R L Hintz; R T Gross; R G Rosenfeld
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Equipping the community to measure children's height: the reliability of portable instruments.

Authors:  L D Voss; B J Bailey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Educational correlates of early and late sexual maturation in adolescence.

Authors:  P M Duke; J M Carlsmith; D Jennings; J A Martin; S M Dornbusch; R T Gross; B Siegel-Gorelick
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Short stature at school entry--an index of social deprivation? (The Wessex Growth Study).

Authors:  L D Voss; J Mulligan; P R Betts
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.508

7.  Effects of maternal intelligence, marital status, income, and home environment on cognitive development of low birthweight infants.

Authors:  V R Bacharach; A A Baumeister
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1998-06

8.  Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood.

Authors:  T J Cole; P J Green
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Psychosocial assessment of children with short stature: a preliminary report.

Authors:  D Skuse; J Gilmour; C S Tian; P Hindmarsh
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1994-12

10.  Predictors of early grade retention among children in the United States.

Authors:  R S Byrd; M L Weitzman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  2 in total

1.  Personality functioning: the influence of stature.

Authors:  F Ulph; P Betts; J Mulligan; R J Stratford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  An evidence and consensus based guideline for acute diarrhoea management.

Authors:  K Armon; T Stephenson; R MacFaul; P Eccleston; U Werneke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.791

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.