Literature DB >> 10735664

Aggressive multimodality therapy for stage III esophageal cancer: a phase I/II study.

E P Alexander1, T Lipman, J Harmon, R Wadleigh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stage III advanced locoregional esophageal carcinoma is frequently unresectable and inconsistently represented in therapeutic trials of esophageal cancer.
METHODS: From 1992 to 1998, 34 of 131 total esophageal cancer patients were designated stage III (16 T3N1, 9 T4N0, 9 T4N1) and medically fit to enter a combined modality protocol with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (CIS-FU, 300 to 600 mg/m2/day), high-dose external beam irradiation (60 Gy), and interval esophagectomy. Staging before and after induction therapy included computed tomography; endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound.
RESULTS: Significant toxicity from induction therapy included death (5/34; 14.7%), pneumonitis (5/34; 14.7%), mucositis (13/34; 38%), and hand-foot syndrome (3/34; 8.8%). In addition to the five deaths, 11 patients did not proceed to operation because of development of esophagorespiratory fistula in 3, distant disease in 2, persistence of T4 stage in 2, progression of comorbidities in 2, and patient refusal in 2. There was a discrepancy between clinical complete response (cCR) at restaging 56% (19/34) and pathologic CR (pCR) noted at the time of operation (8/34; 23.5%). Complete resections were possible in 16 of 18 patients explored. Complications in 4 patients included: death (1), airway injury (1), chylothorax requiring reoperation (1), anastomotic leak (1), recurrent nerve injury with vocal cord paresis (2), and ascaris infection (1). Actuarial survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing showed a 36-month survival of 20% for the group as a whole and 27% for patients restaged cCR (cCR vs PR, p = 0.0046). Treatment failure is predominantly distant, with good local control in resected patients. N0 node status was strongly associated with survival (N0 vs N1 p = 0.0024). There is a trend towards improved survival in the resected group (resected 22% vs nonresected 10% at 3 years, p = 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: Response rates and survival are commensurate with multiple completed phase II and III trials. These are attained at a higher treatment-related mortality. T4 patients can be successfully resected in selected patients. Even in advanced disease, nodal status is a significant predictor of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735664     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01479-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  Clinical response to induction chemotherapy predicts local control and long-term survival in multimodal treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Michael Stahl; Hansjochen Wilke; Martin Stuschke; Martin K Walz; Ulrich Fink; Michael Molls; J Rüdiger Siewert; Michael Schroeder; Hans-Bruno Makoski; Ulrich Schmidt; Siegfried Seeber; Udo Vanhoefer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Predictors of Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Pathologic Major Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy and Surgery: The Impact of Chemotherapy Protocols.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Li; Pei-Ming Huang; Pei-Yi Chu; Po-Ming Chen; Mong-Wei Lin; Shuenn-Wen Kuo; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.