Literature DB >> 10735458

The inaccuracy of venous and capillary blood glucose measurement using reagent strips in the newborn period and the effect of haematocrit.

K Hussain1, N Sharief.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of capillary and venous reagent strip tests (RST) against a reference plasma glucose method, and to assess the impact of haematocrit. One hundred and eighty infants admitted to the Neonatal Unit had blood glucose measured by reagent strip tests using capillary and venous blood samples. Venous plasma glucose was assayed by the Hexokinase method. Each infant had a venous haematocrit performed in the Neonatal Unit. Comparable inaccuracies were noted with both capillary and venous reagent strip tests at all levels. The mean difference between capillary RST and plasma glucose was 0.058 mmol/l (S.D. 1.39). The corresponding mean venous RST plasma glucose difference was 0.138 mmol/l (S.D. 0.96). The two means were statistically different from each other (P = 0.024), but this difference disappeared if the comparison was made only in babies with a PCV of 35-55%. At higher haematocrits (PCV >55%, N= 96) the mean difference between venous RST and plasma glucose was significantly more than the mean difference between capillary RST and plasma glucose (0.018 versus 0.295. P = 0.002). Hence the higher the haematocrit the more inaccurate the venous RST. This study confirms the limited value of reagent strip tests in the assessment of blood glucose in the neonatal period. It suggests that venous RST may be more inaccurate in comparison to capillary and that high haematocrits have a greater effect on venous RST than capillary RST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735458     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00060-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Hum Dev        ISSN: 0378-3782            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of different POCT devices for glucose measurement in a clinical neonatal setting.

Authors:  Matthias Roth-Kleiner; Corinne Stadelmann Diaw; Jocelyne Urfer; Christiane Ruffieux; Dominique Werner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Screening guidelines for newborns at risk for low blood glucose.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  A Simulation Study to Assess the Effect of Analytic Error on Neonatal Glucose Measurements Using the Canadian Pediatric Society Position Statement Action Thresholds.

Authors:  Mark Inman; Kayla Parker; Lannae Strueby; Andrew W Lyon; Martha E Lyon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 4.  The screening and management of newborns at risk for low blood glucose.

Authors:  Michael R Narvey; Seth D Marks
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Accuracy of Human and Veterinary Point-of-Care Glucometers for Use in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta), Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys), and Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  Elizabeth A Clemmons; Melissa I Stovall; Devon C Owens; Jessica A Scott; Amelia C Jones-Wilkes; Doty J Kempf; Kelly F Ethun
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Glucose concentrations in enterally fed preterm infants.

Authors:  Alejandra Barrero-Castillero; Wenyang Mao; Ann R Stark; David Miedema; DeWayne M Pursley; Heather H Burris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  ABM clinical protocol #1: guidelines for blood glucose monitoring and treatment of hypoglycemia in term and late-preterm neonates, revised 2014.

Authors:  Nancy Wight; Kathleen A Marinelli
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Improving the Diagnosis of Neonatal Hypoglycemia in a Well-Baby Nursery.

Authors:  Eric Ly; Jennifer Alexander; Temi Akinmboni; Hyung Woo; Colleen Driscoll
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-09-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.