Literature DB >> 10735368

Urine dipstick testing: comparison of results obtained by visual reading and with the Bayer CLINITEK 50.

A Rumley1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10735368     DOI: 10.1258/0004563001899041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable.

Authors:  A S de Buys Roessingh; A Drukker; J P Guignard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Chapter 1: Definition and classification of CKD.

Authors: 
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl (2011)       Date:  2013-01

3.  Analysis of Paper-Based Colorimetric Assays With a Smartphone Spectrometer.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Woodburn; Kenneth D Long; Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.301

Review 4.  Urinary strips for protein assays: easy to do but difficult to interpret!

Authors:  Guillaume Résimont; Laurence Piéroni; Edith Bigot-Corbel; Etienne Cavalier; Pierre Delanaye
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Screening for chronic kidney disease in a community-based diabetes cohort in rural Guatemala: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  David Flood; Pablo Garcia; Kate Douglas; Jessica Hawkins; Peter Rohloff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick testing for albumin-to-creatinine ratio and albuminuria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jhonatan R Mejia; Jose Ernesto Fernandez-Chinguel; Gandy Dolores-Maldonado; Naysha Becerra-Chauca; Sergio Goicochea-Lugo; Percy Herrera-Añazco; Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-10-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.