Literature DB >> 10733794

Gastric Bypass and Vertical Banded Gastroplasty- a Prospective Randomized Comparison and 5-Year Follow-up.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: a prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare the outcome of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in patients with clinically severe obesity.
METHODS: eligibility criteria included Class IV obesity, < 50 years old and a history of at least one attempt of non-operative weight loss. Patients were managed conservatively for 3 months prior to surgery. Patients were followed post-operatively and monitored for early and late complications and their weight loss outcome for up to 5 years.
RESULTS: 44 patients were recruited. Two patients withdrew within 4 weeks and were excluded. Twenty subjects had a GBP and 22 a VBG. There were no significant differences with respect to age, gender, maximum or pre-operative weight between the groups (p > 0.05). Patients who underwent GBP demonstrated significantly greater post-operative weight loss (p < 0.05) which was apparent from 6 months onwards. There were no deaths, pulmonary emboli, post-operative leaks or wound dehiscence. There were no instances of staple-line disruption. Symptomatic ulcer disease, confirmed endoscopically, developed in 25% of GBP patients. Nine patients developed gallstones post-operatively of whom five were in the VBG and four in the GBP group.
CONCLUSIONS: weight loss following GBP was maintained, while VBG patients slowly regained.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 10733794     DOI: 10.1381/096089295765558169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  41 in total

Review 1.  Effective management of obesity.

Authors:  S O'Meara; A M Glenny; C Wilson; A Melville; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-09

2.  Gastric banding.

Authors:  John M Kellum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Gastrointestinal complications of obesity surgery.

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Brintha Krishnamoorthy; Thomas J Lee
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-04-20

Review 4.  Imaging in bariatric surgery: service set-up, post-operative anatomy and complications.

Authors:  S Shah; V Shah; A R Ahmed; D M Blunt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  T L Trus; G D Pope; S R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Barham K Abu Dayyeh; David B Lautz; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Interdisciplinary European guidelines for surgery for severe (morbid) obesity.

Authors:  Martin Fried; Vojtech Hainer; Arnaud Basdevant; Henry Buchwald; Mervyn Deitel; Nicholas Finer; Jan Willem M Greve; Fritz Horber; Elisabeth Mathus-Vliegen; Nicola Scopinaro; Rudolf Steffen; Constantine Tsigos; Rudolf Weiner; Kurt Widhalm
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  M Fried; V Yumuk; J M Oppert; N Scopinaro; A Torres; R Weiner; Y Yashkov; G Frühbeck
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding vs laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients: long-term results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gitana Scozzari; Eleonora Farinella; Gisella Bonnet; Mauro Toppino; Mario Morino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.