Literature DB >> 10733110

Role of virtual computed tomographic colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions.

M M Morrin1, R J Farrell, V Raptopoulos, J B McGee, R Bleday, J B Kruskal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of computed tomographic colonography to diagnose colorectal masses, stage colorectal cancers, image the proximal colon in obstructing colorectal lesions, and evaluate the anastomoses in patients with previous colorectal surgery.
METHODS: We prospectively performed computed tomographic colonography examinations in 34 patients (20 males; mean age, 64.2; range, 19-91 years): 20 patients had colorectal masses (defined at endoscopy as intraluminal masses 2 cm or larger), 7 patients had benign obstructing colorectal strictures, and 7 patients had a prior colorectal resection. Final tumor staging was available in all 16 patients who had colorectal cancers and 15 patients were referred after incomplete colonoscopy. The ability of computed tomographic colonography to stage colorectal cancers, identify synchronous lesions in patients with colorectal masses, and image the proximal colon in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions was assessed.
RESULTS: Computed tomographic colonography identified all colorectal masses, but overcalled two masses in patients who were either poorly distended or poorly prepared. Computed tomographic colonography correctly staged 13 of 16 colorectal cancers (81 percent) and detected 16 of 17 (93 percent) synchronous polyps. Computed tomographic colonography over-staged two Dukes Stage A cancers and understaged one Dukes Stage C cancer. A total of 97 percent (87/90) of all colonic segments were adequately visualized at computed tomographic colonography in patients with obstructing colorectal lesions compared with 60 percent (26/42) of segments at barium enema (P < 0.01). Colonic anastomoses were visualized in all nine patients, but in one patient, computed tomographic colonography could not distinguish between local tumor recurrence and surgical changes.
CONCLUSION: Computed tomographic colonography can accurately identify all colorectal masses but may overcall stool as masses in poorly distended or poorly prepared colons. Computed tomographic colonography has an overall staging accuracy of 81 percent for colorectal cancer and is superior to barium enema in visualizing colonic segments proximal to obstructing colorectal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10733110     DOI: 10.1007/bf02258293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

Review 1.  Trends in CT colonography.

Authors:  J F Bruzzi; D D Brennan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

2.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The diagnostic value of multiplanar reconstruction on MDCT colonography for the preoperative staging of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kwang Nam Jin; Jeong Min Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Kyung-Sook Shin; Jae Young Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  [CT colonography: pathologic findings and pitfalls].

Authors:  T Mang; A Graser; A Maier; C Mueller-Mang; G Böhm; W Schima
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G B Makin; D J Breen; J R Monson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Computed tomographic colonography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-10-01

Review 8.  Imaging Procedures for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Baeßler; David Maintz; Thorsten Persigehl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

9.  Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) plus contrast medium vs PEG alone preparation for CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in preoperative colorectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Shungo Endo; Tamaki Ichikawa; Keisuke Dasai; Katsuyuki Moriya; Tamio Kushihashi; Shin-ei Kudo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Virtual colonoscopy in stenosing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marco Coccetta; Carla Migliaccio; Francesco La Mura; Eriberto Farinella; Ioanna Galanou; Pamela Delmonaco; Alessandro Spizzirri; Vincenzo Napolitano; Lorenzo Cattorini; Diego Milani; Roberto Cirocchi; Francesco Sciannameo
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-11-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.