Literature DB >> 10732897

Utilization of coronary angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in men and women risk stratified by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.

P K Kilaru1, R F Kelly, J E Calvin, J E Parrillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether men and women are equally likely to receive coronary angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when they are risk stratified according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) practice guidelines for post-MI care.
BACKGROUND: Several previous studies have suggested that women may undergo angiography and revascularization procedures less frequently than men.
METHODS: In 439 consecutive patients admitted to a public hospital with AMI, rates of coronary angiography and revascularization were compared in men and women categorized, according to ACC/AHA practice guidelines, as having strong (class I or IIa) or weaker (class IIb) indications for angiography.
RESULTS: Women were older and more likely to be diabetic or hypertensive, but men and women were equally likely to meet class I/IIa criteria for post-MI angiography (both 51%). Angiography rates were nearly identical in men and women overall (63% vs. 64%), as well as in patients in class I/IIa (80% vs. 82%) and class IIb (46% vs. 46%) (all p > 0.80, with >80% power to detect important differences); the only multivariate predictors of post-MI angiography were age and ACC/AHA class. Significant coronary artery disease was equally prevalent in men and women undergoing angiography, and men and women were equally likely to undergo revascularization, whether they were in class I/IIa (both 55%, p = 0.90) or class IIb (59% vs. 58%, p = 0.88). No significant differences in mortality were noted between men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite being older and having more risk factors than men, women were equally likely to undergo coronary angiography and revascularization procedures after AMI, and they had in-hospital clinical outcomes that were at least as favorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10732897     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00641-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

2.  Coronary Artery Disease in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-02

3.  Sex differences in coronary catheterization and revascularization following acute myocardial infarction: time trends from 1994 to 2003 in British Columbia.

Authors:  Tara L Sedlak; Aihua Pu; Eve Aymong; Min Gao; Nadia Khan; Hude Quan; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  The clinical role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; David R Rosman; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology consensus statement: Task Force on Women and Coronary Artery Disease--the role of myocardial perfusion imaging in the clinical evaluation of coronary artery disease in women [correction].

Authors:  Jennifer H Mieres; Leslee J Shaw; Robert C Hendel; D Douglas Miller; Robert O Bonow; Daniel S Berman; Gary V Heller; Jennifer H Mieres; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Daniel S Berman; Robert O Bonow; Jean M Cacciabaudo; Gary V Heller; Robert C Hendel; Maria C Kiess; D Douglas Miller; Donna M Polk; Leslee J Shaw; Paola E Smanio; Mary N Walsh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.