Literature DB >> 10731249

Staple Disruption and Marginal Ulceration in Gastric Bypass Procedures for Weight Reduction.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staple disruption is a frequent and serious complication of the segmentation procedures of gastric bypass surgery for weight reduction. Staple-line failure is frequently followed by weight gain and often marginal ulceration.
METHODS: We reviewed the literature and analyzed our own series of 623 consecutively performed gastric bypass procedures for staple-line disruption and peptic ulceration. Gastric bypass procedures were broadly categorized by orientation of staple-line and location of the gastric pouch.
RESULTS: Vertical pouches created along the lesser curvature appear to have the highest incidence of staple-line disruption and peptic ulceration. The incidence of staple disruption and marginal ulceration is significantly diminished but not eliminated when gastric segments are completely divided. In our series no cases of staple disruption have been encountered since the gastric pouch has been separated from the excluded stomach by a limb of jejunum.
CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of staple disruption in gastric bypass procedures with vertically oriented, lesser curvature pouches is likely the result of the greater musculature, lower compliance and increased motility of this region of the stomach. The increased incidence of peptic ulceration with lesser curvature gastric pouches may be explained by the high concentration of parietal cells in this area of the stomach. Staple disruption in gastric bypass procedures can be effectively reduced by transaction of gastric segments and possibly eliminated by separation of the pouch from the excluded stomach with a limb of jejunum.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 10731249     DOI: 10.1381/096089296765557259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  21 in total

1.  A new approach for treatment of gastro-gastric fistula after gastric bypass.

Authors:  Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos; Daniel Leslie; Todd Kellogg; Rafael Andrade; Michael Maddaus; David Hunter; Sayeed Ikramuddin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Laparoscopic repair of a staple-line disruption after an open uncut Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Naveen Dhawan; Craig A Ternovits; David S Tichansky
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Decreasing anastomotic and staple line leaks after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Terrence M Fullum; Kanaychukwu J Aluka; Patricia L Turner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Incidence and Prognostic Factors for the Development of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Marginal Ulcers After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Procedures.

Authors:  Julian Süsstrunk; Lara Wartmann; Diana Mattiello; Thomas Köstler; Urs Zingg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Endoscopic management of post-bariatric surgery complications.

Authors:  Mena Boules; Julietta Chang; Ivy N Haskins; Gautam Sharma; Dvir Froylich; Kevin El-Hayek; John Rodriguez; Matthew Kroh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-09-16

Review 7.  Open-surgery management of morbid obesity: old experience-new techniques.

Authors:  Bernhard Husemann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Short-, mid- and long-term results of Larrad biliopancreatic diversion.

Authors:  Alvaro Larrad-Jiménez; Carlos Sánchez-Cabezudo Díaz-Guerra; Pedro de Cuadros Borrajo; Irene Bretón Lesmes; Basilio Moreno Esteban
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Development of ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, incidence, risk factors, and patient presentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Usha K Coblijn; Amin B Goucham; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Sjoerd D Kuiken; Bart A van Wagensveld
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Comparison of marginal ulcer rates between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Lara Ribeiro-Parenti; Konstantinos Arapis; Denis Chosidow; Jean-Pierre Marmuse
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.