AIM OF THE STUDY: Several pilot studies have indicated, that radiation therapy might have a beneficial effect on the course of CNV in AMD. This controlled study was aimed at the question, whether such treatment might halt progression of neovascular AMD and whether a low or a high radiation dose should be applied. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Enclosed were patients aged > or = 60 and < or = 85 and eyes with a VA of > or = 0.1 and < or = 0.6, revealing a juxta/subfoveal CNV either of the occult or the classic type. Treatment was performed with a linear accelerator at fractions of 2 Gy up to a total dose of 10 Gy or 36 Gy. 95 eyes had completed follow-up of > or = 12 < or = 24 months. RESULTS: Among eyes with occult CNV 8 received 36 Gy, 16 were treated with 10 Gy and 21 were in the control group. Mean visual loss was 3.5 lines after 12 months and 5 lines after 24 months with no difference between irradiated eyes and those in the control group. In the groups with classic CNV 8 eyes were treated with 36 Gy, 27 eyes received 10 Gy and 15 eyes were in the control group. Mean visual loss after 6 months was 2.2 lines in eyes of both groups treated with radiation and 5.7 lines in the control group. This was statistically significant (p < 0.05). VA was < 0.1 after 12 (24) months of follow-up in 50 (75)% of the cases with 36 Gy, in 48 (83)% with 10 Gy and in 60 (83)% of the controls. These results were statistically significant after 12 months only. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The natural course of occult CNV could not be improved by irradiation with 10 or 36 Gy. In eyes with classic CNV a VA of > or = 0.1 was maintained significantly more often in irradiated eyes than in those of the control group. Treatment with 36 Gy however was associated with an unacceptable incidence of radiation retinopathy.
RCT Entities:
AIM OF THE STUDY: Several pilot studies have indicated, that radiation therapy might have a beneficial effect on the course of CNV in AMD. This controlled study was aimed at the question, whether such treatment might halt progression of neovascular AMD and whether a low or a high radiation dose should be applied. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Enclosed were patients aged > or = 60 and < or = 85 and eyes with a VA of > or = 0.1 and < or = 0.6, revealing a juxta/subfoveal CNV either of the occult or the classic type. Treatment was performed with a linear accelerator at fractions of 2 Gy up to a total dose of 10 Gy or 36 Gy. 95 eyes had completed follow-up of > or = 12 < or = 24 months. RESULTS: Among eyes with occult CNV 8 received 36 Gy, 16 were treated with 10 Gy and 21 were in the control group. Mean visual loss was 3.5 lines after 12 months and 5 lines after 24 months with no difference between irradiated eyes and those in the control group. In the groups with classic CNV 8 eyes were treated with 36 Gy, 27 eyes received 10 Gy and 15 eyes were in the control group. Mean visual loss after 6 months was 2.2 lines in eyes of both groups treated with radiation and 5.7 lines in the control group. This was statistically significant (p < 0.05). VA was < 0.1 after 12 (24) months of follow-up in 50 (75)% of the cases with 36 Gy, in 48 (83)% with 10 Gy and in 60 (83)% of the controls. These results were statistically significant after 12 months only. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The natural course of occult CNV could not be improved by irradiation with 10 or 36 Gy. In eyes with classic CNV a VA of > or = 0.1 was maintained significantly more often in irradiated eyes than in those of the control group. Treatment with 36 Gy however was associated with an unacceptable incidence of radiation retinopathy.
Authors: Mari Elshout; Carroll A Webers; Margriet I van der Reis; Yvonne de Jong-Hesse; Jan S Schouten Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 2.209