Literature DB >> 10729705

Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation.

C Ranganath1, K A Paller.   

Abstract

Results from recent neuroimaging studies have led to a controversy as to whether right or left prefrontal regions are relatively more important for episodic retrieval. To address this issue, we recorded event-related brain potentials during two recognition tests with identical stimuli but differing retrieval demands. In both tests, participants viewed a sequence of object drawings, half of which were identical to ones viewed earlier except for a change in size and half of which were new. Instructions were to discriminate between old and new objects (general test) or to additionally decide whether old objects were larger or smaller at study (specific test). Frontal brain potentials that were more positive during the specific than during the general test for both old and new objects were interpreted as neural correlates of the process by which specific attributes of test cues are compared with information retrieved from memory. Another ERP difference between the specific and general tests, which was observed for old objects only, had a left posterior scalp topography and was interpreted to reflect the reactivation of memories for studied objects. Frontal and posterior potentials thus reflected two memory processes important for accurate episodic retrieval. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both left and right prefrontal regions were engaged when demands to retrieve and evaluate perceptual information increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10729705     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00048-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  26 in total

1.  Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tim Curran; William J Friedman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study.

Authors:  Tim Curran; Joseph Dien
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Distinct roles for lateral and medial anterior prefrontal cortex in contextual recollection.

Authors:  Jon S Simons; Sam J Gilbert; Adrian M Owen; Paul C Fletcher; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Prefrontal engagement during source memory retrieval depends on the prior encoding task.

Authors:  Trudy Y Kuo; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effect of schizophrenia on frontotemporal activity during word encoding and recognition: a PET cerebral blood flow study.

Authors:  J D Ragland; R C Gur; J Raz; L Schroeder; C G Kohler; R J Smith; A Alavi; R E Gur
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Age-related differences in familiarity and recollection: ERP evidence from a recognition memory study in children and young adults.

Authors:  Daniela Czernochowski; Axel Mecklinger; Mikael Johansson; Michael Brinkmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  ERP correlates of item recognition memory: effects of age and performance.

Authors:  David A Wolk; N Mandu Sen; Hyemi Chong; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Perceptual difficulty in source memory encoding and retrieval: prefrontal versus parietal electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Trudy Y Kuo; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Enactment versus conceptual encoding: equivalent item memory but different source memory.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor; Cyma Van Petten; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Neural evidence for the contribution of holistic processing but not attention allocation to the other-race effect on face memory.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Greta Minor; Tim Curran
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.