Literature DB >> 10729657

Comparison of gen-probe AccuProbe group B streptococcus culture identification test with conventional culture for the detection of group B streptococci in broth cultures of vaginal-anorectal specimens from pregnant women.

N Williams-Bouyer1, B S Reisner, G L Woods.   

Abstract

The performance of the AccuProbe Group B Streptococcus Culture Identification Test (Gen-Probe Incorporated, San Diego, CA, USA) for the detection of group B streptococci (GBS) directly from LIM broth cultures of vaginal-anorectal swab specimens from pregnant women (two swabs per patient in most cases) was evaluated by comparing results to those of conventional GBS culture. Of 411 specimens analyzed, 82 were positive and 312 were negative for GBS by both methods. After initial testing, the percent agreement was 95.9%. The initial sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the AccuProbe test were 90.1%, 97.5%, 91.1%, and 97.2%, respectively. Results were discrepant for 17 specimens: eight were GBS positive by probe and negative by culture; nine were negative by probe and positive by culture. To resolve discrepancies, culture plates were re-examined for GBS colonies, AccuProbe testing was repeated on the initial LIM broth cultures, and the second swab (if received) was inoculated to LIM broth for AccuProbe testing after overnight incubation. After discrepant resolution testing, the percent agreement between the two test methods was 97.8%. The final sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the AccuProbe test were 95.6%, 98.4%, 94.6%, and 98.7%, respectively. These data suggest that the AccuProbe test is a reliable method for detecting GBS in vaginal-anorectal specimens, providing results more rapidly than conventional culture. However, strict adherence to the manufacturer's test protocol is necessary to limit technical errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10729657     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(99)00146-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of methods to increase the sensitivity and timeliness of detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women.

Authors:  Sue B Overman; Douglas D Eley; Barry E Jacobs; Julie A Ribes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prospective evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for detection of group B streptococci in vaginal swabs from pregnant women.

Authors:  H Réglier-Poupet; G Quesne; E Le Théo; M Dommergues; P Berche; P Trieu-Cuot; C Poyart
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Detection of group B streptococci in Lim broth by use of group B streptococcus peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization and selective and nonselective agars.

Authors:  Naomi S Montague; Timothy J Cleary; Octavio V Martinez; Gary W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparative evaluation of the AccuProbe Group B Streptococcus Culture Test, the BD GeneOhm Strep B assay, and culture for detection of group B streptococci in pregnant women.

Authors:  Lisa M Scicchitano; Paul P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of group B Streptococcus bacteria in LIM enrichment broth by peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization (PNA FISH) and rapid cycle PCR.

Authors:  D A Wilson; G S Hall; G W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Laboratory detection of group B Streptococcus for prevention of perinatal disease.

Authors:  F J Picard; M G Bergeron
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Comparison of carrot broth- and selective Todd-Hewitt broth-enhanced PCR protocols for real-time detection of Streptococcus agalactiae in prenatal vaginal/anorectal specimens.

Authors:  Timothy Block; Erik Munson; Anne Culver; Katharine Vaughan; Jeanne E Hryciuk
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis?

Authors:  Michela Paolucci; Maria Paola Landini; Vittorio Sambri
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.