Literature DB >> 10729352

Fos imaging reveals differential patterns of hippocampal and parahippocampal subfield activation in rats in response to different spatial memory tests.

S D Vann1, M W Brown, J T Erichsen, J P Aggleton.   

Abstract

We compared neuronal activation, as measured by Fos staining, during different spatial tasks in two experiments. The counts of Fos-stained neurons in the hippocampus increased as the spatial demands of the tasks increased, the tasks having been carefully matched for other factors. In Experiment 1, matched groups of rats either ran a standard eight-arm radial maze task or were trained to run up and down just one arm of the maze; the number of runs and rewards was identical in both conditions. In Experiment 2, rats were trained on the eight-arm maze but in different rooms. On the critical test day, both groups were run in the same room so that one group now performed with novel landmarks. All hippocampal subfields (dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1, dorsal, ventral, and caudal subiculum) showed a relative increases in c-fos activation in the eight-arm (Experiment 1) and novel room (Experiment 2) conditions, the sole exception being the ventral subiculum in Experiment 2. Although increased c-fos activation was found in both dorsal and ventral hippocampus, in Experiment 2 the relative increase was significantly greater in the dorsal hippocampus. Parahippocampal cortices responded heterogeneously: the perirhinal cortex failed to show increased activation in both experiments, in contrast to the entorhinal and postrhinal cortices. Subsequent comparisons confirmed that the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices responded in qualitatively different ways, the perirhinal cortex differing from the rest of the hippocampal formation. These experiments, which provide the first analysis of hippocampal Fos production during tests of allocentric spatial working memory, reveal that all components of the hippocampus are activated, but that under certain conditions the dorsal hippocampus is disproportionately involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10729352      PMCID: PMC6772240     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory.

Authors:  H Wan; J P Aggleton; M W Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cortical afferents of the perirhinal, postrhinal, and entorhinal cortices of the rat.

Authors:  R D Burwell; D G Amaral
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1998-08-24       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Perirhinal and postrhinal cortices of the rat: a review of the neuroanatomical literature and comparison with findings from the monkey brain.

Authors:  R D Burwell; M P Witter; D G Amaral
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Combined lesions of perirhinal and entorhinal cortex impair rats' performance in two versions of the spatially guided radial-arm maze.

Authors:  T Otto; D Wolf; T J Walsh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Parallel input to the hippocampal memory system through peri- and postrhinal cortices.

Authors:  P A Naber; M Caballero-Bleda; B Jorritsma-Byham; M P Witter
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-07-28       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Activation of the hippocampus and dentate gyrus by working-memory: a 2-deoxyglucose study of behaving rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  H R Friedman; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  R G Morris; P Garrud; J N Rawlins; J O'Keefe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Fetal alcohol exposure alters the induction of immediate early gene mRNA in the rat prefrontal cortex after an alternation task.

Authors:  A H Nagahara; R J Handa
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Activation of c-fos in the brain.

Authors:  D G Herrera; H A Robertson
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  The effects of perirhinal cortical lesions on spatial reference memory in the rat.

Authors:  K A Wiig; D K Bilkey
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  71 in total

1.  Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum.

Authors:  Paul J Colombo; Jennifer J Brightwell; Renee A Countryman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Motivational responses to natural and drug rewards in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampal lesions: an animal model of dual diagnosis schizophrenia.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; David W Self
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Effect of ketamine administration on memory consolidation, p-CREB and c-fos expression in the hippocampal slices of minor rats.

Authors:  Sheng Peng; Yan Zhang; Bingxu Ren; Jiannan Zhang; Hua Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  The subiculum: what it does, what it might do, and what neuroanatomy has yet to tell us.

Authors:  Shane O'Mara
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Working memory deficits in retinoid X receptor gamma-deficient mice.

Authors:  Marta Wietrzych; Hamid Meziane; Anne Sutter; Norbert Ghyselinck; Paul F Chapman; Pierre Chambon; Wojciech Krezel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Experience-dependent gene expression in the rat hippocampus after spatial learning: a comparison of the immediate-early genes Arc, c-fos, and zif268.

Authors:  J F Guzowski; B Setlow; E K Wagner; J L McGaugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Environmental novelty is associated with a selective increase in Fos expression in the output elements of the hippocampal formation and the perirhinal cortex.

Authors:  Michael VanElzakker; Rebecca D Fevurly; Tressa Breindel; Robert L Spencer
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  A Role for the Adenosine ADORA2B Receptor in Midazolam Induced Cognitive Dysfunction.

Authors:  Jennifer Gile; Yoshimasa Oyama; Sydney Shuff; Tobias Eckle
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.116

10.  Features of the expression of the c-Fos gene along the rostrocaudal axis of the hippocampus in common voles after rapid training to solve a spatial task.

Authors:  P A Kuptsov; M G Pleskacheva; D N Voronkov; Kh-P Lipp; K V Anokhin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.