Literature DB >> 10729101

In vitro production of pig embryos: comparisons of culture media and boars.

C R Long1, J R Dobrinsky, L A Johnson.   

Abstract

The utilization of in vitro produced pig embryos for commercial production or research is dependent upon the development of improved methodology. Our objective was to establish a consistent in vitro embryo production (IVP) system and subsequently utilize the procedures to evaluate culture system components and boar effects. To summarize the IVP system, 403 inseminated oocytes from a total of 2243 were analyzed across 17 replicates for maturation and fertilization efficiency, while 1838 zygotes were cultured in 26 replicates for developmental data. Penetration, cleavage and blastocyst development rates were determined at 18, 44 and either 144 or 168 h post insemination, respectively. Monospermic penetration averaged 31.8+/-7.3% while polyspermy was 30.8+/-17.2%. Cleavage rate was 44.9+/-16.1%, with 21.8+/-7.5% of fertilized oocytes and 51.9+/-15.9% of cleaved embryos developing to blastocysts. For culture medium comparison, fertilized oocytes were cultured in either BECM-6, BECM-7, NCSU-23 or NCSU-23aa and supplemented on Day 5 post insemination (pi) with 10% FCS. These treatments resulted in 4.0, 4.9, 19.8 and 13.6% (+/-3.2%) blastocysts by Day 7 pi, with an average cell number of 44.4+/-9.0, 65.1+/-8.2, 61.3+/-4.5 and 64.4+/-4.8, respectively. These IVP procedures consistently produced zygotes from semen of several different boars, capable of forming blastocysts in vitro. Comparison of developmental rates among the boars indicated that this system is variable among boars but not strictly boar-dependent. Culture media comparisons suggest that NCSU-23 yielded a higher percentage of blastocysts than the other media in this IVP system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10729101     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00081-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Strategies for selection marker-free swine transgenesis using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system.

Authors:  Daniel F Carlson; John R Garbe; Wenfang Tan; Mike J Martin; John R Dobrinsky; Perry B Hackett; Karl J Clark; Scott C Fahrenkrug
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Identification of developmental competence-related genes in mature porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Ye Yuan; Jennifer M Ida; Melissa Paczkowski; Rebecca L Krisher
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.609

3.  Building a better mouse embryo assay: effects of mouse strain and in vitro maturation on sensitivity to contaminants of the culture environment.

Authors:  Jason R Herrick; Trevor Paik; Kevin J Strauss; William B Schoolcraft; Rebecca L Krisher
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

5.  Isozygous and selectable marker-free MSTN knockout cloned pigs generated by the combined use of CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/LoxP.

Authors:  Yanzhen Bi; Zaidong Hua; Ximei Liu; Wenjun Hua; Hongyan Ren; Hongwei Xiao; Liping Zhang; Li Li; Zhirui Wang; Götz Laible; Yan Wang; Faming Dong; Xinmin Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Dual effect of fetal bovine serum on early development depends on stage-specific reactive oxygen species demands in pigs.

Authors:  Seong-Eun Mun; Bo-Woong Sim; Seung-Bin Yoon; Pil-Soo Jeong; Hae-Jun Yang; Seon-A Choi; Young-Ho Park; Young-Hyun Kim; Philyong Kang; Kang-Jin Jeong; Youngjeon Lee; Yeung Bae Jin; Bong-Seok Song; Ji-Su Kim; Jae-Won Huh; Sang-Rae Lee; Young-Kuk Choo; Sun-Uk Kim; Kyu-Tae Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.