Literature DB >> 10728947

Intravascular ultrasonic predictors of angiographic restenosis after long coronary stenting.

M K Hong1, S W Park, G S Mintz, N H Lee, C W Lee, J J Kim, S J Park.   

Abstract

The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for stent optimization have not been determined in stenting long lesions. We evaluated the predictors of angiographic restenosis and compared it with stent lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and stent length between short (stent length <20 mm) and long (> or =20 mm) coronary stenting. IVUS-guided coronary stenting was successfully performed in 285 consecutive patients with 304 native coronary lesions. Six-month follow-up angiogram was performed in 236 patients (82.8%) with 246 lesions (80.9%). Results were evaluated using conventional (clinical, angiographic, and IVUS) methods. The overall angiographic restenosis rate was 22.8% (56 of 246 lesions) (short stent 17.6% vs. long stent 32.2%, p = 0.009). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of angiographic restenosis were the IVUS stent lumen CSA (odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence intervals 1.18 to 1.92, p = 0.001) and stent length (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence intervals 0.91 to 1.00, p = 0.039). The angiographic restenosis rate was 54.8% for stent lumen CSA of <5.0 mm2 (short stent 37.5% vs. long stent 73.3%, p = 0.049), 27.4% for CSA between 5.0 and 7.0 mm2 (short stent 24.1% vs. long stent 31.7%, p = 0.409), 10.5% for CSA between 7.0 and 9.0 mm2 (short stent 10.0% vs. long stent 12.5%, p = 0.772), and 11.4% for stent lumen CSA of > or =9.0 mm2 (short stent 10.4% vs. long stent 13.3%, p = 0.767) (p = 0.001). Compared with short coronary stenting, long coronary stenting is effective treatment modality to cover long lesions with comparable long-term clinical outcomes in cases of stent lumen CSA of > or =7.0 mm2. Regardless of the stent length, the most important factor determining angiographic restenosis was the IVUS stent lumen CSA in relatively large coronary artery lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10728947     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00769-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Palmaz stent deployment for subclavian and brachiocephalic arterial occlusive disease. Factors predictive of restenosis.

Authors:  H Nakagawa; K Kichikawa; K Takayama; M Sakamoto; T Wada; T Taoka; A Fukusumi; S Iwasaki; H Uchida; T Sakaki
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Distinguishing characteristics of erythrocyte-rich and platelet-rich thrombus by intravascular ultrasound catheter system.

Authors:  Eric Johnstone; Stephan E Friedl; Alok Maheshwari; George S Abela
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Coronary stents and vascular response to implantation: literature review.

Authors:  Marta Francesca Brancati; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Ornella Leonzi; Claudio Cuccia; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2017-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.