Literature DB >> 10728265

Community health monitoring: taking the pulse of America's children.

N Halfon1, P W Newacheck, D Hughes, C Brindis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, content, enablers/barriers, and impact of child health reports in nine communities participating in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded Child Health Initiative (1991-1996).
METHODS: A qualitative, prospective, multiyear, longitudinal evaluation using a multiple case-study methodology. Three waves of structured in-person and telephone interviews of the project staff, community leaders, and key participants tracked the development of child health reports in all nine communities. A mailed survey of project directors was administered to assess accomplishments at the completion of the project. Content analysis of each community health report was conducted using different conceptual frameworks for health measurement and reporting.
RESULTS: All communities succeeded in creating a report that contained a broad set of outcome indicators reflecting children's health and well-being. The process of creating these reports, their content, level of analysis, presentation formats, and dissemination varied across sites based on available resources, data and analysis capacity, and other political considerations. While commonly accepted outcome measures were used in most reports (e.g., infant mortality, teen births, immunization rates), process indicators, important for quality monitoring and community health improvement, were notably lacking. In each community the reports were credited with providing a more comprehensive and integrated view of the health needs of children.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional conceptual and technical work is needed to improve the ability of community health reports to capture key indicators of interest. Community reports can serve an important role in building the consensus needed to create program and policy changes. Community reports may have additional utility in monitoring the impact of health systems change on population health. Community reports can also facilitate a shared learning process for the participants and the community, and can be a useful tool to advance a children's health policy agenda.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10728265     DOI: 10.1023/a:1022940806347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  4 in total

1.  Evaluating community efforts to decategorize and integrate financing of children's health services.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; N Halfon; C D Brindis; D C Hughes
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Improving children's access to health care: the role of decategorization.

Authors:  D C Hughes; N Halfon; C D Brindis; P W Newacheck
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1996

Review 3.  The use of formative evaluation to assess integrated services for children. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Child Health Initiative.

Authors:  C Brindis; D C Hughes; N Halfon; P W Newacheck
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Decategorizing health services: interim findings from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Child Health Initiative.

Authors:  P W Newacheck; D C Hughes; C Brindis; N Halfon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.301

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Creating a community report card: the San Diego experience.

Authors:  D R Simmes; M R Blaszcak; P S Kurtin; N L Bowen; R K Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Meeting the data needs of a local health department: the Los Angeles County Health Survey.

Authors:  P A Simon; C M Wold; M R Cousineau; J E Fielding
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.