Literature DB >> 10726934

Circumcision in men and the prevention of HIV infection: a 'meta-analysis' revisited.

N O'Farrell1, M Egger.   

Abstract

There is debate on the role of male circumcision in HIV transmission. Most case-control and cohort studies from Africa have shown an association between a lack of circumcision and an increased risk of HIV infection in men. The evidence is conflicting, however, with cross-sectional surveys from Tanzania and Rwanda either showing no relationship or an association in the opposite direction. A recent review and meta-analysis of the literature concluded that the risk of HIV infection was lower in uncircumcised men (combined odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.99). However, the analysis was performed by simply pooling the data from 33 diverse studies, which is an inappropriate method for combining studies. We re-analysed the data, stratifying by study, and found that an intact foreskin was associated with an increased risk of HIV infection: combined odds ratio 1.43 (1.32 to 1.54) with a fixed effect model and 1.67 (1.25 to 2.24) with a random effect model. There was significant between-study heterogeneity (P<0.0001) which was partly explained by stronger associations in studies in high-risk groups. The results from this re-analysis thus support the contention that male circumcision may offer protection against HIV infection, particularly in high-risk groups where genital ulcers and other STDs 'drive' the HIV epidemic. A systematic review is required to clarify this issue. Such a review should be based on an extensive search for relevant studies, published and unpublished, and should include a careful assessment of the design and methodological quality of studies. Much emphasis should be given to the exploration of possible sources of heterogeneity. In view of the continued high prevalence and incidence of HIV in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the question of whether circumcision could contribute to prevent infections is of great importance, and a sound systematic review of the available evidence should be performed without delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10726934     DOI: 10.1258/0956462001915480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  16 in total

1.  Male circumcision and HIV prevention. Some science would not have gone amiss.

Authors:  R S Van Howe; C J Cold; M R Storms
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-09

2.  HIV infection and AIDS among young women in South Africa.

Authors:  Adamson S Muula
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.351

3.  Socio-Demographic, Reproductive and Clinical Profile of Women Diagnosed with Advanced Cervical Cancer in a Tertiary Care Institute of Delhi.

Authors:  Neha Dahiya; Damodar Bachani; Anita S Acharya; D N Sharma; Subhash Gupta; K P Haresh
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-06-13

Review 4.  Review: a critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision for HIV prevention in developed countries.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Robert C Bailey; Jeffrey D Klausner; Arleen Leibowitz; Richard G Wamai; Jake H Waskett; Joya Banerjee; Daniel T Halperin; Laurie Zoloth; Helen A Weiss; Catherine A Hankins
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2012-03-28

Review 5.  Male circumcision and HIV infection risk.

Authors:  John N Krieger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Langerhans' cell density and degree of keratinization in foreskins of Chinese preschool boys and adults.

Authors:  Qi Qin; Xiang-Yi Zheng; Yu-Yong Wang; Hua-Feng Shen; Fang Sun; Wei Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  Economic evaluations of adult male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olalekan A Uthman; Taiwo Aderemi Popoola; Mubashir M B Uthman; Olatunde Aremu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Expression of DC-SIGN in human foreskin may facilitate sexual transmission of HIV.

Authors:  E J Soilleux; N Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Strong Protective Effect of Circumcision against Cancer of the Penis.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Ronald H Gray; Xavier Castellsague; F Xavier Bosch; Daniel T Halperin; Jake H Waskett; Catherine A Hankins
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-05-22

Review 10.  An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS).

Authors:  Patrick Sequeira-Byron; Zbys Fedorowicz; Vanitha A Jagannath; Mohammad Owaise Sharif
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.