OBJECTIVE: We compared the opinions, knowledge, and attitudes of final-year medical, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nursing, and pharmacy students about complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). METHODS: A cross-sectional study questionnaire (n = 442) was administered on site at the University of Western Ontario and the University of Toronto to fourth-year health professions students. Outcome measures were self-reported knowledge, attitude, and perceived usefulness of CAM therapies, the perceived importance of scientific inquiry for the acceptance of CAM, and educational exposure to the topic. RESULTS: Educational exposure to CAM was correlated with the perceived usefulness of CAM. Medical students reported the least amount of education about CAM and viewed CAM therapies as less useful than did their health professions student peers. Medical students and pharmacy students were more likely than the other health professions students to view traditional scientific forms of evidence as necessary before accepting CAM therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions differed among the different health professions student groups about the usefulness of CAM therapies and the kind of evidence needed before they should be incorporated into standard care. This may have important implications for multidisciplinary care.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the opinions, knowledge, and attitudes of final-year medical, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nursing, and pharmacy students about complementary/alternative medicine (CAM). METHODS: A cross-sectional study questionnaire (n = 442) was administered on site at the University of Western Ontario and the University of Toronto to fourth-year health professions students. Outcome measures were self-reported knowledge, attitude, and perceived usefulness of CAM therapies, the perceived importance of scientific inquiry for the acceptance of CAM, and educational exposure to the topic. RESULTS: Educational exposure to CAM was correlated with the perceived usefulness of CAM. Medical students reported the least amount of education about CAM and viewed CAM therapies as less useful than did their health professions student peers. Medical students and pharmacy students were more likely than the other health professions students to view traditional scientific forms of evidence as necessary before accepting CAM therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions differed among the different health professions student groups about the usefulness of CAM therapies and the kind of evidence needed before they should be incorporated into standard care. This may have important implications for multidisciplinary care.
Authors: Fei-Yi Zhao; Gerard A Kennedy; Sonja Cleary; Russell Conduit; Wen-Jing Zhang; Qiang-Qiang Fu; Zhen Zheng Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Ranjana Chaterji; Rochelle E Tractenberg; Hakima Amri; Michael Lumpkin; Sharon B W Amorosi; Aviad Haramati Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: Ryan B Abbott; Ka-Kit Hui; Ron D Hays; Jess Mandel; Michael Goldstein; Babbi Winegarden; Dale Glaser; Laurence Brunton Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Syed S Hasan; Chew S Yong; Muneer G Babar; Cho M Naing; Abdul Hameed; Mirza R Baig; Shahid M Iqbal; Therese Kairuz Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Dawn Desylvia; Margaret Stuber; Cha Chi Fung; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi; Edwin Cooper Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 2.629