Literature DB >> 10725532

The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale: a new instrument for the measurement of depersonalization.

M Sierra1, G E Berrios.   

Abstract

Existing self-rating scales to measure depersonalization either show dubious face validity or fail to address the phenomenological complexity of depersonalization. Based on a comprehensive study of the phenomenology of this condition, a new self-rating depersonalization questionnaire was constructed. The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale is meant to capture the frequency and duration of depersonalization symptoms over the 'last 6 months'. It has been tested on a sample of 35 patients with DSM-IV depersonalization disorder, 22 with anxiety disorders, and 20 with temporal lobe epilepsy. Scores were compared against clinical diagnoses (gold standard) and correlated with the depersonalization subscale of the Dissociation Experiences Scale (DES). The scale was able to differentiate patients with DSM-IV depersonalization disorder from the other groups, and showed specific correlations with the depersonalization subscale of the DES (r=0.80; P=0.0007). The scale also showed high internal consistency and good reliability (Cronbach alpha and split-half reliability were 0.89 and 0.92, respectively). The instrument can, therefore, be considered as valid and reliable, and can be profitably used in both clinical and neurobiological research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10725532     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00100-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  57 in total

Review 1.  Dissociative disorders in medical settings.

Authors:  Edward MacPhee
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  The Munich Diagnostic and Predictor Study of Dizziness: objectives, design, and methods.

Authors:  C Lahmann; P Henningsen; M Dieterich; R Feuerecker; C A Cyran; G Schmid
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Prevalence and correlates of depersonalization in students aged 12-18 years in Germany.

Authors:  Matthias Michal; Eva Duven; Sebastian Giralt; Michael Dreier; Kai W Müller; Julia Adler; Manfred E Beutel; Klaus Wölfling
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Daily fluctuation of emotions and memories thereof: Design and methods of an experience sampling study of major depression, social phobia, and controls.

Authors:  Andrew T Gloster; Marcel Miché; Hanna Wersebe; Thorsten Mikoteit; Jürgen Hoyer; Christian Imboden; Klaus Bader; Andrea H Meyer; Martin Hatzinger; Roselind Lieb
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Atypical bodily self-awareness in vicarious pain responders.

Authors:  Natalie C Bowling; Vanessa Botan; Idalmis Santiesteban; Jamie Ward; Michael J Banissy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Acute stress in patients with brain cancer during primary care.

Authors:  Simone Goebel; Hans Strenge; H Maximilian Mehdorn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Multi-dimensional modulations of α and γ cortical dynamics following mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Poppy L A Schoenberg; Anne E M Speckens
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Face processing in depersonalization: an fMRI study of the unfamiliar self.

Authors:  Sarah Ketay; Holly K Hamilton; Brian W Haas; Daphne Simeon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Disturbed Experience of Self: Psychometric Analysis of the Self-Experience Lifetime Frequency Scale (SELF).

Authors:  Henriëtte Dorothée Heering; Saskia Goedhart; Richard Bruggeman; Wiepke Cahn; Lieuwe de Haan; René S Kahn; Carin J Meijer; Inez Myin-Germeys; Jim van Os; Durk Wiersma
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.944

10.  Ketamine and fMRI BOLD signal: distinguishing between effects mediated by change in blood flow versus change in cognitive state.

Authors:  Kathryn M Abel; Matthew P G Allin; Katarzyna Kucharska-Pietura; Chris Andrew; Steve Williams; Anthony S David; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.