Literature DB >> 10724794

Health economics in the Canadian pharmaceutical industry.

L Assiff1, M R Pollock, P Manzi, B Faienza, D Menon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the goals, strategic focus, structure, capabilities, activities and effectiveness of health economics (HE) departments in the Canadian pharmaceutical industry, to examine how these have evolved, and the implications of HE in the future of the pharmaceutical industry. DESIGN AND
INTERVENTIONS: A mixture of telephone and face-to-face interviews with members of the HE unit (survey 1) and the chief executive officers (CEOs) [survey 2] of the top 21 Canadian pharmaceutical companies was undertaken in 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: 17 out of 21 companies responded to the first survey, and 12 of the 17 CEOs responded to our second survey. The goals of the HE department in most of the pharmaceutical companies have evolved from supporting efforts to gain reimbursement on government drug plans to include pricing, promotion, internal decision-making and other activities. Members of the HE department perceive their work to be valuable to the company. The CEOs felt that the true value of HE data is not adequately understood by formulary reviewers and, therefore, HE data may be an impediment to market access.
CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of the HE department is to demonstrate the value of the company's product to provincial government insurers. However, pharmaceutical companies are having difficulty justifying the importance of the HE department because of inconsistencies in the interpretation of economic evaluations by healthcare payers.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10724794     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199916060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  7 in total

1.  Using pharmacoeconomic analysis to make drug insurance coverage decisions.

Authors:  A H Anis; T Rahman; M T Schechter
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Strategic use of pharmacoeconomic research in early drug development and global pricing.

Authors:  K Clemens; L P Garrison; A Jones; F Macdonald
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Use of economic evaluation guidelines: 2 years' experience in Canada.

Authors:  J F Baladi; D Menon; N Otten
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Economic factors in the development of new antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  R J Porter
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1998

5.  Update and evaluation of Australian guidelines. Government perspective.

Authors:  A Mitchell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Update and evaluation of Australian guidelines. Industry perspective.

Authors:  B Carmine
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Why is the pharmaceutical industry investing increasing amounts in health economic evaluations?

Authors:  F Andersson
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.188

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Using economic evaluations to make formulary coverage decisions. So much for guidelines.

Authors:  A H Anis; Y Gagnon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life and regulatory issues in the US and Canada.

Authors:  Judith Glennie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.