Literature DB >> 10724741

Predictors of demand for emergency prehospital care: an Australian study.

M J Clark1, J Purdie, G J FitzGerald, N G Bischoff, P K O'Rourke.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Determining the predictors of demand for emergency prehospital care can assist ambulance services in undertaking policy and planning activities. HYPOTHESIS: Demand for prehospital care can be explained by demographic, health status, and economic determinants.
METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design to investigate the association of demographic, health status, and insurance factors with the use of prehospital, ambulance care. Core data items including age, gender, marital status, country of origin, triage score, diagnosis, time of presentation, method of arrival, and patient disposition were collected for every patient who presented at the Emergency Department of the study hospital over a four-month period. Ambulance usage was analysed using Poisson regression.
RESULTS: For the 10,229 patients surveyed, only a small number were triaged as having the highest level of urgent medical need (0.8%), but the majority of these used prehospital emergency medical care (90.2%). Predictors of ambulance use included age > 65 years (Prevalence Ratio [PR] = 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-3.63), being married or in a de-facto relationship (PR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.60-0.79) or divorced, separated, or widowed (PR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.70-0.98), triage score level 1 or 2 (PR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.68-2.28), or triage score level 3 (PR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.38-1.72), diagnosis involving either mental (PR = 4.29; 95% CI: 1.84-10.01), nervous (PR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.19-6.31) or trauma (PR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.03-5.27) conditions, and insurance status (PR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.40-1.71). Ethnicity, gender, and time of day were not associated with usage.
CONCLUSION: Demand for ambulance services can be predicted by a number of demographic, medical status, and insurance variables. Age and triage levels are key influences on demand for ambulance services. Ambulance insurance status provides an economic incentive to use ambulance services regardless of the urgency of the medical condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10724741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  5 in total

1.  Nonfatal heroin overdoses in Queensland, Australia: an analysis of ambulance data.

Authors:  Michele J Clark; Angela C Bates
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  A Critical Analysis of Debates Around Mental Health Calls in the Prehospital Setting.

Authors:  Polly Christine Ford-Jones; Claudia Chaufan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Patterns and Predictors of Emergency Medical Services Utilisation by Patients Attending the Emergency Medicine Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

Authors:  Prithvishree Ravindra; Rachana Bhat; Nisarg Karanth; William Wilson; B N Lavanya; Simran Umra; Shweta Mahesh
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Influence of socioeconomic factors on medically unnecessary ambulance calls.

Authors:  Chihiro Kawakami; Kenji Ohshige; Katsuaki Kubota; Osamu Tochikubo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Factors influencing the decision to convey or not to convey elderly people to the emergency department after emergency ambulance attendance: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Johan Oosterwold; Dennis Sagel; Sivera Berben; Petrie Roodbol; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.