Literature DB >> 10724723

How are we doing with physical activity?

B H Marcus1, L H Forsyth.   

Abstract

An estimated 60% of U.S. adults are inactive or underactive, and nearly half of America's youth (aged 12 to 21 years) are not vigorously active on a regular basis. Downstream interventions provide individual strategies that effectively increase short-term participation in physical activity by 10% to 25%. Downstream and midstream approaches tailored to individual preferences have greater success. Packaging and disseminating physical activity programs for community, worksite, and health care settings are not as far along as for other areas, although inactivity prevalence is about twice that of smoking, and both risk factors have substantial morbidity and mortality. Less is known about effectiveness of upstream approaches, which have potential for the greatest public health impact. Suggestions include continued promotion of moderate-intensity physical activity, greater dissemination of successful programs, and investigation of physical environment influences.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10724723     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-14.2.118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of health-promoting behavior and lifestyle of adolescents of a north Indian city.

Authors:  Sonika Raj; Suraj Singh Senjam; Amarjeet Singh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions.

Authors:  Vicki S Conn; Adam R Hafdahl; Pamela S Cooper; Lori M Brown; Sally L Lusk
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Outdoor fitness equipment in parks: a qualitative study from older adults' perceptions.

Authors:  Hsueh-Wen Chow
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Does the use of outdoor fitness equipment by older adults qualify as moderate to vigorous physical activity?

Authors:  Hsueh-Wen Chow; Chia-Hua Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Co-Production at Work: The Process of Breaking Up Sitting Time to Improve Cardiovascular Health. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Thomas D Griffiths; Diane Crone; Mike Stembridge; Rachel N Lord
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Outdoor Fitness Equipment Intervention in Achieving Fitness Goals for Seniors.

Authors:  Hsueh-Wen Chow; Kun-Tang Chang; I-Yao Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions.

Authors:  Jenny Woodman; James Thomas; Kelly Dickson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.